 |
Unmeaningful History
A Sweeping Look At The American Southwest Suffers From Garbled Details
By Gregory McNamee
SEPTEMBER 29, 1997:
Legends Of The American Desert, by Alex Shoumatoff (Knopf).
Cloth, $30.
A DOZEN YEARS ago, Alex Shoumatoff, a New Yorker magazine
staff writer and sometime visitor to the American Southwest, set
out to write a "sweeping hydrohistory" of the region.
He abandoned the project at about the time two such large-scale
studies appeared: Marc Reisner's Cadillac Desert, and Donald
Worster's Rivers of Empire.
It's probably good that he did. On the evidence of the book he
eventually wrote about the Southwest, Shoumatoff's projected hydrohistory
would almost certainly have been found wanting in comparison to
the other two, which were hailed as instant classics.
The book we have, Legends of the American Desert, recounts
Shoumatoff's adventure-seeking forays into the Southwest and offers
an historical overview of the region. It's well written, as all
of Shoumatoff's books are. It's also glancing, disconnected, vignette-driven
and impressionistic, advancing a view of the Southwest, "the
least American part of the United States," as the abode of
The Other--namely, Indians and Hispanics, who stand largely as
ciphers in his argument that the Southwest is still-contested
territory.
Shoumatoff is more interested in the divergence of Hispanic,
Anglo, and Native worlds than in the ways in which these worlds
come together to form a regional culture; one that makes the Southwest
recognizably different from any other place. That these worlds
indeed diverge--and sometimes collide--is an old and ultimately
not very interesting trope in writing about the region. How they
blend and merge is a much more subtle matter, one that few writers
have addressed.
Shoumatoff's book cleaves into two rough categories, the first
historical, the second journalistic. In the first area, his narrative
is shot through with problems: The chronology of Southwestern
prehistory is a jumble of misinterpretations, the understanding
of ethnography at best partial, the reading of historical facts
and trends off by a matter of degrees.
In writing his sweeping historical overview of the region, Shoumatoff
relies heavily on other published histories. His bibliography,
however, does not mention some of the most important works--the
ones to which professional historians turn. He haughtily dismisses
such scholarly books as mainly "unreadable." He may
be right, but, like it or not, they demand consultation nonetheless.
What's worse, Shoumatoff doesn't consult Spanish sources. To
attempt a history of the Southwest without a command of those
sources and at least some knowledge of the Spanish language--and
when Spanish words appear in the text they are as often as not
misrendered--is to court disaster.
In contemporary matters, Shoumatoff yields better results. He's
a skilled journalist with a number of good books of reportage
(The Mountain of Names, The World Is Burning) to
his credit. When he gets into the territory and pursues
stories at first hand his book shines. A substantial part of Legends
of the American Desert, for instance, documents the tale of
Clayton Lonetree, the hapless Navajo marine who fell in love with
a Russian girl while pulling embassy duty in Moscow and gave away
a few state secrets in the bargain; Lonetree served a long term
in Leavenworth as payment for his infatuation. Shoumatoff's alternately
sympathetic and no-nonsense account of Lonetree's unfortunate
story, in which racism and cultural misunderstandings come heavily
into play, would have made a good book in itself.
At other turns, Shoumatoff does a good job of unbaring the weird
atomic subculture of Los Alamos, New Mexico, and an even better
job of exposing the trendy pretenses of nearby Santa Fe, a place
true Southwesterners love to hate. Santa Fe, which Shoumatoff
rightly pegs as "the capital of the ersatz Southwest,"
is, as it happens, absolutely fair game for an outside observer.
Unlike most other venues in the Southwest, here it's possible
not to know much about the past, even the recent past, and still
get the present right.
However unsuccessful the book, one has to admire Shoumatoff's
ambition in writing Legends of the American Desert, the
kind of omniscient, big-picture narrative that's rarely attempted
these days. And Shoumatoff's skills as a writer are certainly
admirable. Unfortunately, his skills and ambition have not yielded
any meaningful understanding of the region. Best to return to
the yellowing pages of, say, Paul Horgan's Great River,
and hope for a better synthesis in time to come.
|


|