 |
By the Numbers
Wanna know what's wrong with modern rock? Here are two examples
By Noel Murray
SEPTEMBER 11, 2000:
Last summer, I had to drive across the country in a vehicle with no
tape deck or CD player, which left the open road, my own thoughts, and
whatever I could punch up on the radio. Mostly I found "new country" and
"modern rock" stations; but who can really tell those formats apart? Both
are dominated by mid-tempo songs overstuffed with production frills and
virtually free of personality or unshakable melodies. Say what you will
about the contemporary urban sound, with its generic hip-hop backdrop and
passionless grunting, at least it's a distinctive genre. The current
modern rock and new country radio formats are reminiscent of the adult
contemporary of the '80s--aside from a few stylistic nods to the roots of
their respective styles, the chief product is innocuous, inoffensive,
unaffecting music.
It's understandable (to an extent) that such a fate would befall
country music in the wake of a decade-long economic boom. Mainstream
country has always been eager to follow the money, especially if it means
shedding a small-town, bumpkinized image. But rock 'n' roll has generally
followed the youthful urge for something new and preferably troubling; yet
aside from the nastier bits of formulaic rap-rock hybrids like Limp Bizkit
and Kid Rock, the playlist of most modern rock stations wouldn't rouse a
napping parent, let alone angry up the blood of this nation's future
leaders.
The biggest non-offenders are the "number bands": 3 Doors Down, matchbox
20, Blink 182, SR-71, and Nine Days (along with unnumbered but equally
unexceptional fellow travelers like Sister Hazel, Vertical Horizon, The
Verve Pipe, and Marcy Playground). Each of these bands has its virtues--a
well-realized hit single, or a moment of lyrical or melodic grace in an
otherwise clunky tune--but the cumulative effect of so much line-toeing is
indifference or, worse, tedium.
Exhibit 1 in the case against number bands is Eve 6--a bratty-looking,
marketing-friendly trio of Los Angelenos whose two LPs offer smooth,
hard-ish rock with surface appeal and little that sticks in the soul. Eve 6
have a theoretical edge. Their short, spiky hair, visible tattoos,
and guitar-driven sound mark them as punks--not to mention references to
Jessica Rabbit and gratuitous use of the word "shit"--but their booming,
echoing sound is designed to fill big rooms, not cramped clubs.
On the band's sophomore release Horrorscope, a production team
led by Don Gilmore infuses the L.A. power trio's crunchy rock with dollops
of synthesizer and digital trickery to give the songs a Y2K vibe and to
bury the featureless vocals of Max Collins. Meanwhile, the songs themselves
never get too loud or too fast, and the arrangements lean heavily on
rapidly sung monotone verses that break for punchy, harmonic choruses. It's
a simple dynamic, and the three members of Eve 6--all 20-year-old Third Eye
Blind fans, according to their bio--indulge it over and over for 12 tracks.
Let's break down one song, as an example. The third track on
Horrorscope, "On the Roof Again"--the one right after the mediocre
first single, "Promise"--opens with a two-note, on-the-beat guitar riff
that carries throughout the first verse, accompanied by a barely audible
two-note bass-line and a straightforward 4/4 drum part. Over this, Collins
sings a detail-free lyric about a young man who gets married and leaves
home. Then the chorus kicks in, the song's protagonist is caught cheating
with another woman, and as he heads to the roof to threaten suicide, the
music changes a bit. Drummer Tony Ferguson hits his cymbal, bassist Jon
Siebels sings along with Collins in a sound-alike shout, and the cadence of
the words goes from pounding forward to swaying back and forth in a
sing-song. After the second appearance of the chorus, there's an arresting,
Tubes-like synthesizer break, but then the song returns to form, only with
a tad more volume. There's nothing to hum along to, the lyrics tell an
uninteresting story of an unlikable guy, and though the song is performed
with energy, it never breaks out into crazy, frenetic territory. It's like
Third Eye Blind without the killer hooks--strictly by the numbers.
The second album by the Manhattan, Kan., trio Ultimate Fakebook appears
on first glance more promising. The Midwesterners sport a plain, less
trendy look in the photos that appear on This Will Be Laughing Week,
and the record's packaging is a goofy spoof of high-school yearbooks. Then
there's the band's bio, which points out that the three members of Ultimate
Fakebook are in their mid- to late 20s and consider their primary
influences to be The Replacements and The Kinks.
But when the disc starts spinning, it becomes clear that Ultimate
Fakebook's primary influence is whatever's landing on modern rock
playlists. There's a lot of Foo Fighters in the Kansans' full-steam-ahead
rock racket, but again, like Eve 6, Ultimate Fakebook shy away from really
cutting loose, making eardrums bleed, or working up an involuntary sweat in
the listener. (The same can't be said for Foo Fighters, who often make a
powerful noise.) The first four tracks on This Will Be Laughing Week
feature the same mid-tempo rhythmic bash, the same riff-less guitar
distortion, the same Elvis-Costello-without-the-bile vocals of Bill
McShane, and the same brief-silence-before-the-chorus arrangement. The
fifth track is a ballad and is ostensibly structured just as its
predecessors, only quieter and a beat slower. Then the pattern repeats for
the rest of the 14 songs.
I've no doubt that Ultimate Fakebook's hearts are in the right
place--and to their credit, they don't sound as slick as the number bands
that dominate modern rock radio. But the fact that they're a slightly rawer
version of the same old thing doesn't change the fact that they are
the same old thing. It's as though no one in the band even considered that
there might be a more novel way to present these words, or to invigorate
these melodies, or to change up these rhythms. It's one, two, three, go,
and if you've heard it all before, maybe you'll at least think that they do
it a little better.
Granted, the group never claimed to be pushing any boundaries. In fact,
on Ultimate Fakebook's Web site, the band claims, "If rock and roll is
dead, somebody forgot to tell Ultimate Fakebook. Not rap-metal, or
dance-pop, or alt-country--but rock and roll." That's the other trend that
pervades contemporary music, especially on the radio: On my hot interstate
trek last summer, I noted the preponderance of stations advertising what
they're "not"--no twangy stuff, no hard stuff, no doo-wop, no rap. Just
good music, right?
Right?

|



|