 |
Comics Get Booked!!
The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund Battles Censorship.
By Devin D. O'Leary
SEPTEMBER 8, 1998:
The Year was 1994. Mike Diana, creator of an all-but-unknown illustrated 'zine called Boiled Angel, sat in a Florida Courtroom and listened as a judge
destroyed his life and his career.
Four years ago, Diana became the very first American artist in
history to be convicted of obscenity for his or her artwork. A
local Florida undercover detective, posing as a contributing artist,
had enticed Diana into sending him two copies of Boiled Angel.
The self-published 'zine had achieved some notoriety for Diana's
shocking and graphic depictions of society's most serious problems:
child abuse, date rape and the inhumanity and intolerance brought
about by the abuse of religion. Boiled Angel wasn't pretty,
but it was protected under the laws of the Constitution. ... Or
was it?
A Florida jury found Diana guilty of producing obscenity because
they agreed his work "lacked serious literary, artistic,
political or scientific value" when compared to such works
as The Grapes of Wrath or Picasso's Guernica. Diana
appealed his
conviction all the way up to the United States Supreme Court.
Last June, the highest court in the land upheld the decision by
the Florida judge. The artist was required to pay a $3,000 fine,
undergo psychological testing, have no contact with children under
18 years of age, perform 1,248 hours of
community service, enroll in a journalistic ethics course and
serve three years of probation. During the course of his
probation, Diana's residence can be inspected at any time, without
warning or warrant, to determine if he is in possession of, or
is creating, "obscene material." In other words,
if Diana is caught so much as sketching on a cocktail napkin,
he could be thrown in jail.
This is not the first incident of censorship within the comic
book industry, but it's certainly the most dramatic. Diana is
now living in New York City and, for a time, was ironically serving
out his community service by volunteering for the very organization
that paid his extensive court costs over the past few years--The
Comic Book Legal Defense Fund.
Since 1990, CBLDF has raised more than $200,000 to pay expenses
related to defending free speech and freedom of expression in
the artistic community. The Fund has helped more than a dozen
comic book retailers and professionals fend off the censors--some
successfully, some not. "It's funny," says Denis Kitchen,
president and founder of both CBLDF and Kitchen Sink Press, "because
in the first 15 or 20 years of my existence in underground comix,
there were very, very few cases (of censorship). I think it's
mostly because (comic books) were literally pretty underground,
and they weren't that visible. As comics began to get more popular,
people--including local authorities--began to be more aware of
them. And the elements of the population that were ... let's just
say religious, morally uptight, began to freak out because in
their eyes comic books were for kids. Suddenly they saw comic
books with sex, drugs, politics, you name it, that were not the
comics they grew up with." Today, neary 80 percent of comic
books are read by adults--a statistic that doesn't seem to phase
the censors.
The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund was officially incorporated
as a nonprofit charitable organization in January 1990 as the
result of another infamous obscenity trial. Four years previous,
a comic book store in Lansing, Ill., called Friendly Frank's was
busted for selling "obscene" comics. Christopher Oarr,
executive director of the CBLDF explains: "It all started
in 1986. A sheriff's deputy was driving through this Chicago suburban
community. (He) took an interest in the local Friendly Frank's
outlet because of what he later described as 'a lascivious depiction'
of a character that turned out to be Wonder Woman. ... Later,
undercover agents went in. They went into the adult section, which
was clearly marked and segregated as such. And that's when they
seized comics." Denis Kitchen, whose Kitchen Sink
Press had
produced one of the seized books (Omaha the Cat Dancer),
got on the phone and began drumming up support for his
embattled client.
Almost a decade later, Kitchen
remembers gearing up for battle: "We ended up raising between
20 and 30,000 dollars. I then went out and found the best First
Amendment attorney in the country, and we ended up getting a guy
named Burton Joseph, who was associated with the Playboy
Foundation." Joseph successfully overturned the conviction
at the appellate level. Kitchen and his troops were inspired by
their triumph. "It was a big victory and we were real pleased
with ourselves. At that point, (the CBLDF) was a one-man organization,
and I had some money left in the bank. And I asked myself a simple
question, 'Should I just donate the money to another good cause,
or should I actually start an organization that's constantly vigilant
because this (sort of legal action) could happen again?' Needless
to say, it started happening a lot."
The CBLDF's guiding principle is that "comics should be accorded
the same constitutional rights as literature, film or any other
form of expression." Quite often, they are not. In 1996,
the CBLDF helped win a long-fought battle in California. Comic
book writer and artist Paul Mavrides (The Fabulous Furry Freak
Brothers) was disputing a 1990 sales tax bill in the amount
of $1,400 based on the sales of his artwork. Under California
law, unlike novels or movie scripts, comic books did not qualify
as "intangible ideas presented in manuscript form,"
and their creators were subject to the same taxes as producers
of raw goods like corn, pencils and matchbook covers. In the wake
of a five-year crusade (and more than $75,000 in legal fees),
California's Board of Equalization agreed that comics are an expression
of ideas and thus should be considered as part of an author's
manuscript.
In 1996, the CBLDF successfully defended the rights of Tim Truman
and Joe Landsdale in their battle against musicians Johnny and
Edgar Winter. In their DC comic Jonah Hex: Riders of the Worm,
Truman and Landsdale created two characters called "The Autumn
Brothers." The musicians didn't much appreciate the caricature
and sued for defamation in civil court. According to Oarr: "In
the Tim Truman/Joe Landsdale case, we defended against the charge
of slander. We defended the right of cartoonists to engage in
satire, which is protected speech." Put simply, the Legal
Defense Fund is interested in any case in which an artist's constitutional
rights have been trampled. As Oarr says: "The uniting principle
in all the cases we undertake is the First Amendment--not censorship
exclusively, but the First Amendment."
Since the nationwide publicity in the wake of Mike Diana's case,
however, the CBLDF has gained some powerful allies. Well known
artists and writers like Frank Miller (Sin City), Dave
Sim (Cerebus) and Neil Gaiman (Sandman) regularly
contribute to CBLDF's fundraising efforts by donating artwork,
comics and autographs for auction at comic book conventions or
through the Fund's Web site (www.cbldf.org). Numerous publishers
(Frontier Comics, Head Press) have donated profits from some of
their comics exclusively to CBLDF. Most recently, Oni Press in
Portland released Free Speeches, a graphic novel designed
to raise funds and consciousness in the continued fight against
censorship in the comic book medium. The book includes orations
by Dave Sim, Frank Miller and Neil Gaiman alongside the
powerful words of Ms. Nadine Strossen, president of the American
Civil Liberties Union. New illustrations for the book were donated
by such graphic luminaries as Arthur Adams, Peter Bagge, Jaime
Hernandez, Sergio Aragonés, Shannon Wheeler, Evan Dorkin,
Bill Sienkiewicz, Will Eisner and many more. Printing
companies, comic book distributors and others have waived their
normal fees to help this important book reach the public (See
"Books," p. 24). Obviously, censorship is of concern
to the entire comic book industry.
The industry's concern is hardly surprising. The simple fact is
comic books are under the biggest barrage since the 1950s. Following
close on the heels of Mike Diana's disappointing case came the
end to a similar two-year battle in Oklahoma. Planet Comics of
Oklahoma City was the target of a police raid in September 1995.
Police were tipped off by a nonprofit obscenity watchdog group
called Oklahomans for Children and Families (you may remember
them as the group who recently forced police to raid local homes
and snatch back rental copies of the "obscene" film
The Tin Drum--an Academy Award winner from 1979). Planet
Comics' owners, Michael Kennedy and John Hunter, were arrested,
carted away in handcuffs and charged with trafficking, keeping
for sale and display obscene material deemed to be harmful to
adults--the disputed work, a nationally distributed "adults
only" comic called Verotika No. 4.
Keep in mind, these comics were not being sold to minors; the
owners of Planet Comics were busted for selling "adult"
comics to adults. Nevertheless, they were determined to be "dangerous
criminals," and their bail was set at $50,000. The Comic
Book Legal Defense Fund paid the men's nonrefundable bond. In
September of last year, however, the two pled guilty to reduced
charges to avoid going to trial. In exchange, they were granted
a three-year deferred prison sentence and a fine of $1,500 each.
According to Kitchen: "The CBLDF didn't really lose that
case. The
fellows who were busted just decided to give up because they couldn't
handle the aggravation anymore. They also faced prison sentences
if they lost. Already, in one case, it cost the guy his marriage;
and in the case of both fellows, they lost their business. It
took the heart out of them. I mean, here we are saying, 'Look
guys, we'll defend you because it's an important principle.' And
they're going, 'Our lives are destroyed. We want out.'"
Although the end results of the Mike Diana and the Planet Comics
cases are frightening, word seems to be getting out about the
Comic Book Legal Defense Fund. Kitchen is confident that "the
signal we sent out there to both our industry and to every district
attorney who was paying attention was, 'Look, here's an organization
that's willing and able to fight. You pick on us and we're not
gonna fall over.' That's important, because I tell you, early
on these cops and these prosecutors tended to be bullies. They
didn't expect a comic shop to fight back."
In the future, perhaps election-minded politicians, conservative
judges and uninformed community leaders will think twice about
trying to knock down an easy target like today's "funny book"
peddlers. "It's unfortunate that we need to continue to exist,"
concedes Oarr. "But what we find is that we can be much more
effective operating quickly, responding quickly and being as proactive
as possible in educating people both about the First Amendment
and about the reality of the comic book marketplace. Which is
much different than it was 20 years ago--or certainly 40, 50 years
ago."

|



|