Wyatt Earp's Last Deputy
Glenn Boyer Is Almost As Tough And Controversial As The Old West Hero Whose Character He Strives To Defend.
By Emil Franzi
AUGUST 31, 1998: IF YOU THINK American politics have become nasty and "uncivil," try the history of the American West. You can be called a liar, a thief and anything from a draft-dodging coward to a sexual pervert just for expressing an opinion about who shot notorious badass Johnny Ringo. There are people who take this stuff as seriously as the Earps and Clantons took each other. They can make a Jesse Helms speech on the U.N. sound equivocating and a Leno monologue on Clinton seem downright benevolent.
Much of the controversy revolves around that somewhat enigmatic figure, Wyatt Earp. You get a whiff of just how intense that controversy is by attending a conference--the "Annual Rendezvous"--of a group of western history buffs called the National Outlaws and Lawmen's Association (NOLA). They met recently in Tucson, and Earp was high on their agenda.
Almost 200 people from around the country spent four days here and in Tombstone listening to a variety of speakers and writers discussing Doc Holliday, Earp, and some lesser-known bad and good guys, while another 50 or so exhibitors, authors and booksellers set up at the back of the meeting room at The Holiday Inn Palo Verde.
The conference itself was generally polite. The membership consists mainly of normal folks--unlike Trekkies, there were few bizarre costumes--and the organization's leadership tried to keep the verbal bloodshed to a minimum. But most of the principle antagonists showed up on the first morning, and you needed one of the Bowie knives on display to cut the tension. Some of these people really don't like each other.
While their arguments occassionally degenerate into personal attacks, they're often substantive and reflect deep differences in everything from methodology to cultural heritage. There's also a decided conflict between those who publish books and articles and those who don't. Some of the non-published prefer spending their time attacking those who do.
The central figure of the Earp controversy is longtime Cochise County resident Glenn G. Boyer. Love him or hate him--and there's little middle ground--he's as central a figure to Earpiana (the term he coined) as Earp himself was to Tombstone. He's been vilified and praised, plagiarized and quoted by almost everybody who ever studied the subject. He's been called a liar, a fraud, a perpetrator of hoaxes and worse. There's even a current hit sheet circulating accusing Boyer, a retired lieutenant colonel and command pilot who spent 20 years in the U.S. Air Force, of being a draft dodger who manipulated his entire military career to avoid combat. Like an old western-movie fast-gun hero, Boyer has plenty of enemies who want to take him on. And unlike the challengers in most of those old flicks, many of Boyer's enemies aren't above back-shooting.
Boyer's most recent principle antagonist is Casey Tefertiller, author of Wyatt Earp--The Life Behind the Legend (Wiley & Sons, 1997). Unlike most of Boyer's detractors, Tefertiller at least actually wrote a book, although Boyer alleges it's really a committee product. Tefertiller himself lends credence to that charge by often lapsing into "we" when discussing it, and referring questions about it to others during Q&A sessions.
Tefertiller is vitriolic in his attacks on Boyer. At a January conference of another group of western history buffs, the Western Outlaws and Lawman's Association (WOLA--not to be confused with NOLA), he likened Boyer's work to that of holocaust revisionist writer David Irving. Yet one of his own footnotes quotes a Boyer article on Morgan Earp.
Tefertiller and the anti-Boyer crowd went bonkers when they discovered Boyer had canceled his appearance in what was being billed as the big shootout over the OK Corral. Boyer begged off, saying he was suffering from the flu. His antagonists immediately claimed Boyer was a coward afraid to face their champion Tefertiller and spent the remainder of the weekend loudly trashing him.
Tefertiller, claiming prior commitments, recently turned down an opportunity to debate Boyer live or by telephone hookup on local radio immediately following the NOLA gathering--an offer Boyer accepted. No one has accused Tefertiller of cowardice for that, and Boyer's critics should give him the same courtesy over his January illness. Too bad the shootout didn't come off--Tucson Media Monitoring would've made a bundle from Earp buffs on that exchange.
Lake was one of several writers who worked with Earp, who died in 1929. It's generally suspected that Lake's publishers, hoping for a big-seller, may have guided many of his inaccuracies. Others tried to get another book out of Earp's widow, Josie, who lived until 1944, but according to some family members she was manipulative and wanted certain things that would've reduced her "respectability" left out--like Earp's second wife, to whom he was married when Josie ran off with him.
The debunkings began in 1960 with Frank Waters' now-discredited The Earp Brothers of Tombstone, which portrayed them as little more than thugs. Others, including Boyer, have contributed to the rather large Earp bibliography over the years. Boyer believes Waters' malice was motivated by a desire to get even with Josie for failing to give him her story. Boyer alleges Waters falsified statements of Virgil Earp's widow, Alvira (Allie). Virgil died in 1905, his widow lived until 1947.
Tefertiller's book--published by a large New York outfit noted for producing architectural material, not Western American history--came out last year. It was accompanied by a strange publicity sheet--strange because a quarter of it was devoted to an attack on Boyer. Yet except for one footnote, Tefertiller's book didn't mention Boyer. If someone were writing a psychiatric treatise attempting to debunk Freud, we'd expect at least a mention of Freud in the text.
Tefertiller greatly enhanced the Earpomania debate by his almost unprecedented attacks on Boyer, not that Boyer hasn't had his detractors over time. That's easy to understand--Boyer is opinionated, cantankerous, interesting and funny as hell. And he's not kind to his detractors, giving them back at least as good as he gets. But when one historian goes after another, it's fair to judge the attacker by the quality of his own work, and in this regard, Tefertiller doesn't measure up.
Tefertiller claims that while Earp was hanging around Hollywood backlots at the end of his life, he ran into the young Marion Morrison, a.k.a. John Wayne, who later "modeled his persona" on those encounters. Tefertiller's source? A single remark by TV's Wyatt Earp, Hugh O'Brian, claiming that the Duke once, 30 years ago or so, told him that he was doing a helluva job, and he, the Duke, should know because he knew Wyatt Earp. That's it. No other reference, no other source, no mention of this rather earth-shaking news by anybody who ever knew John Wayne, including John Ford, who did know Earp and who undoubtedly would've told everyone if Earp had met Wayne.
Or, as Tefertiller said of a claim of Boyer's at the NOLA gathering: "A story he heard from somebody else with no substantiation."
One who did write was Earp buff Roger Peterson, who sent a letter much too long to print defending Tefertiller as "a trained journalist." Peterson spoke on Earp at the NOLA convention, leading off with the statement that Earp has only had "two real biographers"--Lake and Tefertiller. Otherwise, he underscored the obvious.
Peterson is the kind of guy who would give you a lecture on jungle lore that told you lions bite, fire burns, and it rains a lot. He also decried the "turf wars" taking place in western history--odd, because he's one of the most partisan of the turf grabbers. That is, if he ever published anything of note on the Earps, which he hasn't. He also dislikes Boyer's writing style, which many find engrossingly superior to his, or Tefertiller's.
Tefertiller also claims that family members are generally "unreliable" as historical sources. Boyer's 50-plus years of research into the Earp legend involves massive materials gleaned from Earp family members and others to which Tefertiller didn't have access. One can clearly understand Boyer's choice of methodology.
Those who promote Tefertiller's work by stressing he's a "trained journalist" have brought their ducks to the wrong market. Today's "trained journalists" are taught to rely heavily on two things--official sources and prior news stories. Thus Tefertiller's bibliography neglects many secondary sources.
He claims that many of those secondary sources aren't all that relevant, but that causes him real credibility problems. For example, Tefertiller waxed on at the NOLA gathering about his "discovery" of the resignations of Wyatt and Virgil Earp as lawmen in 1882. As Terfertiller was speaking, however, Tombstone town historian Ben Traywick walked over and silently handed a reporter a copy of Tombstone Clippings, edited by Traywick and published in 1989. It contains a copy of that resignation on page 174.
Except for his passion to keep what he considers to be the truth about the Earp legend straight--a promise he made to a close friend, Earp's niece Estelle Miller--the most telling fact about Glenn Boyer is that he often just doesn't give a damn. He has a sense of humor, unlike Tefertiller and most of his adherents, who appear dour, boring, and constantly uptight. They don't even know when they're being tweaked.
Boyer has written more about the Earps and the other western characters who revolved around them than anyone, and over the last half-century he's revised some of his own material. His first book, An Illustrated History of Doc Holliday, was an admitted hoax at the time of publication in 1966--something ignored by his detractors, who keep accusing him of doing what he admitted all along. Boyer says he did that--and has done it elsewhere--to illustrate how easy it is to bullshit people over the history of the Old West, and to make people wary of much of what has been written.
This led to his first major work, The Suppressed Murder of Wyatt Earp (Naylor, 1967, reprint editions available from the author). Boyer chose that title to illustrate how the Earp myth then being perpetrated was murdering the memory of the real man.
Two of his other major books are I Married Wyatt Earp (University of Arizona Press, 1976, still available in paperback) and Wyatt Earp's Tombstone Vendetta (Talei Publisher's, Honolulu, 1993, available most easily from the author at P.O. Box 40, Rodeo, New Mexico, 88056).
Both these titles are clearly described as "Collected and Edited by Glenn G. Boyer," a description which points to the crux of the controversy over his works: Academic historians dislike Boyer's method, and his enemies claim the manuscripts and other items he has based these and other works on may not even exist.
Boyer says he's tried to imitate the novelist-approach-to-history popularized by Truman Capote with In Cold Blood. Boyer, too, is a novelist. He published a group of books in the 1980s. His latest, Winchester Affidavit (Thorndike Press, 1997), is set in New Mexico and fictionalizes late 19th-century events there. His wife, Jane Candia Coleman, has also used this form successfully in Doc Holliday's Woman (Warner Books, 1995) and her latest book, I, Pearl Hart (also published by Thorndike). Interestingly, no one of note has yet to attack Coleman, who uses the same method and often the same research base.
Advocates of various standards of recording history are driven nuts by Boyer's methods. He edits primary sources and uses composite characters speaking in the first person, often without direct attribution. I Married Wyatt Earp is based on multiple sources, including two attempts by Earp's widow Josephine to tell her story her way. That she wanted both herself and Wyatt to look "respectable" shouldn't be surprising. That she also told relatives things not included in what she told several ghost writers would also logically follow.
Boyer used the same novelistic approach in Wyatt Earp's Tombstone Vendetta, employing fictional characters he names Ten Eyck and Ten Eyck Jr. to relay many things not presented elsewhere-- from the death of Johnny Ringo to that of Old Man Clanton. Boyer alleges Wyatt Earp killed both of them, a claim which is hotly disputed by many others, including Ringo's biographer, Jack Burrows (Johnny Ringo; The Gunfighter Who Never Was, UA Press, 1987).
Boyer's critics are now all over him for inventing Ten Eyck, and they're once again claiming "fraud." But a cursory glance at Vendetta makes it obvious Ten Eyck is a composite character and that Boyer's reason for using him is to cover sources he feels obligated to protect and privacies he wishes to honor.
Relatives of historical figures, particularly controversial ones, usually don't like being readily available to anyone who wants to talk to them or poke through their stuff. Many wish to keep their privacy; others don't want to be quoted for fear of offending other family members; still others want secrets to remain so until they pass on. Journalists call these people "sources" and protect them.
Which is where Boyer's methods also conflict with Tefertiller's. Boyer uses those sources; Tefertiller usually sticks to standard practice and refuses to count many of them, although his choices often seem arbitrary. As a result Boyer's occasional highly-educated guesses appear to be as useful as Tefertiller's research, or anybody else's.
Of course, Boyer's methods don't sit well with the academic types, who are trying to move western history away from the "buffs" and stratify it according to "accepted methods of historiography."
One academic who went after Boyer is Prof. Gary Roberts of Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College in Tifton, Georgia. In a long article in a recent western-history newsletter, reprinted in The Tombstone Tumbleweed, Roberts lashed out at Boyer for a number of sins. These include a belief that historians "demand the highest standards of research and historical method," that "reminiscences are not the most credible historical documents," and most telling from Roberts' perspective: "Original discovery does not convey an exclusive right to interpret, or guarantee that the researcher who makes the find will necessarily provide the 'best' explanation of its meaning."
Roberts also wrote a jacket blurb for Tefertiller's book, apparently indicating the reminiscences of Hugh O'Brian are acceptable to him.
One of Roberts' real problems with Boyer is that he hasn't shared much of his research. Boyer pleads guilty to that charge, admitting he doesn't share with people who piss him off. Boyer's attitude: If you want to know about this stuff, go look like he did. Roberts treats Boyer like a teaching assistant who's obligated to turn over what he finds, and bitches when he won't.
But Boyer has shared with others, including Roberts, who says of him, "Until Boyer's sources can be authenticated, the interpretations based on them cannot even be addressed."
But this year's publication by the University of Oklahoma Press (a publisher well-respected for its western history titles) of Karen Holliday-Tanner's Doc Holliday: A Family Portrait was disconcerting for both Roberts and Tefertiller. Tefertiller even refused to participate in a joint book-signing at a local bookstore with her.
Tanner is the great-granddaughter of Doc Holliday's cousin, and had access to items never before presented. She gives credit to her husband John Tanner, a history professor at Palomar College, for his assistance, which should satisfy the academics. And she strongly credits Boyer for his aid in allowing her access to all those documents and items that some keep claiming don't exist.
Tanner now joins the ranks of Ben Traywick and others who thank Boyer for his help, as does by implication Bat Masterson's biographer Robert deArment (Bat Masterson: The Man and the Legend, University of Oklahoma Press, 1979), who wrote the introduction to Tanner's book. Tefertiller's almost mantra-like claims that Boyer "has been discredited" have fallen on their ass.
Roberts, who's been working on a biography of his fellow Georgian Doc Holliday for some time, is the author of more than 50 articles on western lore and several books on violence in the Old West. His latest is Death Comes to the Chief Justice (Slough-Rynerson, 1990), about events in early New Mexico. He recently visited Boyer's ranch, and now concedes that Boyer does have "much" of what he claims, but still disputes his methodology.
"Historians should not put words in the mouths of the dead," Roberts says.
Novelists do, and Boyer's response is, "I'm a novelist--and a damn good one."
Roberts sides with Tefertiller, who simply dismisses it as "highly unlikely" and refuses to discuss credible evidence supporting Boyer's contention. But Roberts says he respects Tanner's work, although he'll reserve comment on much of it until he's had time to review it. And he decries the personal animosity that has set into the Earpiana debate, placing some distance between himself and Tefertiller's "David Irving" charges against Boyer.
While it's clear that some Earpomaniacs have considerably less integrity than the bad-asses they discuss, most are normal people with a deep interest in a fascinating subject. It's impossible to write a full history of Arizona and the West without discussing the events in Tombstone in the 1880s. Who killed Johnny Ringo will be debated at least as long as who killed Napoleon or Hitler.
After all the pulling and tugging and name-calling, it's clear that the real picture of Wyatt Earp has emerged. While not exactly Stuart Lake's Boy Scout, he was hardly a thug. In the confines of his times, he was a reasonably decent man, a real leader, and tougher than hell when he had to be. Even the newer flicks like Tombstone and Kevin Costner's Wyatt Earp are much closer to reality than earlier attempts.
That this view is now generally considered accurate by most Earpomaniacs can be attributed to one man--Glenn Boyer. It was Boyer who filled out the shadowy characters in Tombstone's history--from Big Nosed Kate to Sheriff John Behan. Forget the trivia and the personalities, and the arguments over method, it's been Boyer's overall view of Earp that has been accepted by even his staunchest foes, including Tefertiller.
Even if they stole it, or plagiarized it, or failed to credit him for it, or even claimed he made up part of it, it's the one tale everybody else is trying to tell. Boyer has accomplished what the Earp brothers' niece asked him to--tell the true story of who her uncles really were.
News & Opinion: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Cover . News . Film . Music . Arts . Books . Comics . Search
© 1995-99 DesertNet, LLC . Tucson Weekly . Info Booth . Powered by Dispatch