 |
This Gun for Hire
The return of "Le Samourai"
By Jim Ridley and Noel Murray
It may have been the Summer of Love, but 1967 has gone down in film
history as the year of the postmodern gangster movie. It was the year John
Boorman's brilliant, brutal Point Blank shattered its narrative like
a jackboot stomping a weakling's glasses. It was the year Faye Dunaway's
Bonnie and Warren Beatty's Clyde got gunned to pieces because they bought
into their own outlaw mythology. And it was the year a stone-cold hit man
adjusted his wide-brimmed fedora, walked into a crowded Parisian nightclub,
and emptied his pistol into the owner. Why did you come here, the victim
asks. "To kill you," the hit man replies. There is no emotion in his voice
and none expected. This is just business. Bam. Bam. Bam.
Like Point Blank and Bonnie & Clyde, Le Samourai is impossible to
imagine without the influence of six decades of crime movies. It's the work
of a French director, Jean-Pierre Mel-ville, who grew up feasting on
American pulp thrillers and glossy Hollywood dramas, which fueled his
themes of loyalty, betrayal, and codes of honor and conduct among the
criminal classes. And yet it's an amazing, one-of-a-kind movie--a slow,
fanciful, ruminative character study seething with thuggish cool--that has
led to some of the most over-the-top action movies of recent years.
If you go expecting the slam-bang bloodshed of the movies it
inspired--chiefly Reservoir Dogs and The Killer--you'll
probably fall asleep. (This influence is probably what got the movie
rereleased.) But if you love movies that change the way you see the world,
that plant you in another person's consciousness for two hours, that allow
you to pretend you're stalking the streets of Paris with steel-blue eyes
and killer reflexes, you'll want to tell every hardcore movie nut you know
about it--which I pretty much spent the weekend doing.
Le Samourai opens with a great, unsettling shot of a big empty
hotel room with a solitary figure laid out on the bed, wreathed in
cigarette smoke. Using a famous trick employed by Hitchcock and countless
other suspense directors, the camera simultaneously pulls backward and
zooms forward, creating a disorienting warp in perspective--but
cinematographer Henri Decae (The 400 Blows) staggers the zoom
effect, making the room seem to bow and bend. That's how it feels to be
master assassin Jef Costello, a cold-blooded loner whose sole companion is
a bullfinch that chirps at the sign of danger (a neat touch). Alain Delon,
his face as pale and impassive as a Kabuki mask, plays Jef; he was cast as
much for his suave, blank pretty-boy looks as for his ability to look
debauched and haunted all at once.
The movie follows Jef as his latest assignment turns into a nightmare of
police lineups, constant surveillance, and double-crosses that must be
repaid in blood. The police press his casual lover (Nathalie Delon) to rat
him out; a mysterious cabaret singer (Caty Rosier) refuses to finger him,
which is suspicious in itself. It dawns on him, and on us, that he has
fulfilled his last contract. Nevertheless, he accepts one more job--one
whose target, he learns, is much closer to home. He refuses to back out. He
has, after all, accepted the money.
Jean-Pierre Melville (n Grumbach; he adopted the name of his
favorite author) was a flamboyant tough guy and lifelong movie buff who
fought in the French Resistance during World War II. His wartime
experiences, like Samuel Fuller's, shaped a view of the world best
expressed in tough, gut-level crime-dramas. (His fast, economical methods
of working were an inspiration to the young Truffaut and Godard, the latter
of whom cast the veteran director in a great cameo in Breathless.)
Melville even dressed the part. He favored wide-belted Sam Spade trench
coats, and he adopted a brash Stetson as his trademark.
It is no surprise, then, that he would understand the allure of gangster
chic so well. His 1955 noir drama Bob le Flambeur unfolds in a kid's
dress-up dream of a criminal underworld, and Melville loses himself so
completely in its ambience that he doesn't even fool with the rat-a-tat
requirements of action filmmaking. He's happy just to tag along with his
fatalistic hero, savoring the streets and the feeling of owning them.
Le Samourai, made 12 years later, is even more refined. Every
movement has the heaviness of ritual. Crime is a formalized repetition of
behavior: Jef performs every criminal act in the movie at least twice, in
exactly the same methodical way, whether it's stealing a car with a ring of
skeleton keys or acquiring a new set of plates. When Jef dons his fedora
before leaving for a hit, he rubs his thumb along the brim as if he were
crossing himself--a gunslinger's rite of preparation. This isn't just a
killer's natural caution, though; it's an acknowledgment of how much we
movie junkies crave the conventions of gangster flicks. So potent is the
gangster iconography that Melville sometimes obscures Jef's face
completely. He knows the cocked hat and trench coat have power all by
themselves.
Just business Alain Delon as Jef Costello in Le
Samourai
Delon looks so perfect and moves with such stealth that the director
follows him as if in a wish-fulfillment reverie. If you took out every
scene of Jef stalking the city streets, the movie would be an hour shorter.
But it wouldn't have its bizarre, unique mood of moving constantly without
going anywhere, the mood captured in the very first shot. And it wouldn't
have its overwhelming sense of place. We're always aware of city life at
its different levels, in every sense of the word. The action takes place in
apartments, on the street, and underground, sometimes simultaneously, and
there's a strong sense of criminals, civilians, and police coexisting
uneasily in the same world. As lit by Decae, that world is all hard,
matte-finish surfaces, as cold and grayish-blue as gunmetal. Even the glass
interior of the nightclub seems confining--part prism, part prison.
There are plenty of cool assassin movies, many of them influenced by
this one. But Le Samourai imagines more vividly than any other what
it would be like to stand in a killer's shoes--not just during bursts of
violence, but throughout every agonizing second of existential dread,
insecurity, and elation. The movie's glacial pace makes you feel the weight
of Jef's every small decision--which is appropriate, since his life rides
on every one. It's easy to see why generations of movie fanatics, from the
Nouvelle Vogue to Martin Scorsese to John Woo and Quentin Tarantino, fell
in love with the icy glamour of Jean-Pierre Melville's movie-fed fantasies
of underworld life. To see Le Samourai on a big screen is to
remember pointing toy guns as a kid and reenacting scenes from the late
show--only with Melville's adult awareness that the stuff of cinematic
fantasy draws real blood.--Jim Ridley
Breaking wind
Producer Jerry Bruckheimer makes the kind of movies that are referred to
as thrill rides, and they are--the kind you find at a shopworn parking-lot
carnival, where grizzled fugitives stand prepared to blow town if the
Tilt-A-Whirl pitches Aunt Marge into the next county. Con Air is the latest
excursion into BruckheimerLand, the muy-macho theme park where all women
are potential rape victims, gays are too worthless to beat up, and the
villains score laughs with racist wisecracks about Affirmative Action and
Ebonics. But hey, they're villains.
Actually, in this high-concept popcorn picture, even the heroes are
villains--or more accurately, they're criminals, shackled aboard a
top-security prison-transport flight. Sharing the ride is a paroled
ex-soldier, Cameron Poe (Nicolas Cage), en route to see his wife and the
daughter he's never met. When hardened lifers seize control of the plane,
Poe must battle his fellow inmates, contact the authorities, and still
deliver a stuffed bunny on time for his daughter's birthday.
Less bruising and more fun (for awhile) than last year's blockheaded
The Rock, Con Air is essentially an airborne version of the
much better The Dirty Dozen, right down to the demographically
chosen passenger list. I could've done without the serial rapist Johnny 23
(a fearsome Danny Trejo), whose only purpose is to menace Rachel Ticotin's
female guard--but without him there's no reason for her to be on the
flight, since women in BruckheimerLand are either arm candy or victims.
What's more, a tea party between a little girl and a serial killer is a
sick tease even by the movie's nihilistic standards.
On the plus side, John Malkovich's arch mastermind and his scurvy gang
of cutthroats, including Ving Rhames and M.C. Gainey, get the snarkiest
lines in Scott Rosenberg's script, and they pop every zinger home. As a
Lecter-like mass murderer, the great Steve Buscemi doesn't get much to say,
but his one-sentence commentary on Lynyrd Skynyrd gets the movie's biggest
laugh, and his zonked calm shows the power of shrewd underplaying. As for
the heroes, Cage essentially does a steroidal H.I. McDonough, John Cusack
has some droll moments as a U.S. marshal, and Monica Potter is appealing
beyond the call of duty in her few scenes as Cage's wife.
Just as the movie starts to work up some steam, the filmmakers crap out
with a dull desert shoot-out and a standard-issue explosionfest on the Las
Vegas Strip, edited (like the rest of the movie) into an implausible,
incoherent frenzy of establishing shots, poorly matched special effects,
and stuff blowing up God knows where. Director Simon West, another faceless
drudge in Bruckheimer's army, employs The Rock's principle of
montage: count to one and cut. If you've seen everything out there and you
still crave a dumb big-budget action movie, this'll suffice until a good
one comes along. Me, I think I'll rent the 1974 Burt Reynolds vehicle
The Longest Yard--an anti-authoritarian prison comedy ballsy enough
to blow Con Air away.--Jim Ridley
Animal abuse
I've always found something very sad about domesticated animals. When a
pet gets out into the open air, its first instinct is usually to trot off.
Left alone, they often forget themselves and occasionally get lost. That
doesn't bother me. What gets me is when they come back, or rather why they
come back. Is it because of some emotional attachment to the master?
Because they know where the easy food is? Or do they return to their homes
merely out of habit, because it's the only life they can imagine? None of
these prospects, not even the alleged bond, appeals to me. Pets are
charming and comforting, but contemplating a beast with a confused
nature--torn between freedom and routine--is hardly pleasant.
Caroline Thompson's film Buddy is about a woman who believed in
the absolute domestication of animals. The story is mostly true, based on
the life of New York socialite Gertrude Linz, who kept an incredible
menagerie on her sprawling estate--birds, horses, show dogs, and a handful
of chimpanzees. The chimps were her special project, and Linz felt that if
apes were treated as human children, they would grow up with intelligence
and nobility.
Rene Russo plays Gertrude Linz, in a winning and tricky performance. She
plays Linz as both ebullient and slightly crazed, but ultimately
determined, especially when she takes on an impossible task--raising a
gorilla from infancy to adulthood. Linz names the great ape Buddy and is
initially successful at forging a connection and training the animal to
behave politely and helpfully. Buddy, though, can't be restrained forever,
and it's not long before he starts losing touch with his affection for Linz
and begins feeling the urge to run wild.
It's easy to want to like Buddy. Thompson, who wrote the
script as well as directed, has her finger on a fascinating dilemma--the
difficulty in maintaining a communication with another species. She backs
up her story with painfully sad images. Buddy (played by a man in a gorilla
suit, with facial animatronics by Jim Henson's Creature Shop) dances alone
in his cage with Getrude's robe in his hands; Buddy, in butler's duds,
drops a deviled egg from a tray he's struggling to carry; Buddy sits in one
velvet chair after another, searching for one that he can settle into
comfortably. These are memorable, heartbreaking moments.
Unfortunately, Buddy's tone is all wrong. Thompson tries to
balance the fanciful and the sober--and to tell a true story to boot--and
the whole rickety thing collapses. By rigidly adhering to the facts of
Linz's own memoir, Thompson cuts herself off from plot developments that
could've strengthened her tale. What is Linz's relationship with her
impossibly understanding husband (played by Robbie Coltrane)? Why does she
insist on projecting imagined personalities onto her pets? Thompson also
raises the "yeah, right" quotient every time she shows her apes sitting
down to dinner at a table like normal humans. Any realism in these scenes
is quickly diluted by zaniness.
The larger problem, though, is that Buddy is ostensibly a
children's movie. This is a depressing and often scary story, about a
serious theme. To gear the film toward kids is a gross miscalculation, one
that betrays both the story and its young audience. More than one child at
the screening I saw left visibly upset by Buddy's sudden, melancholy rages.
And as a adult, I was put off by the film's slapsticky elements. Every few
minutes, there are annoying madcap antics by the chimps--as they wear
clothes and roller skate and generally undercut the very animal dignity
that the film tries so hard to build. It's as though Thompson is ignoring
her own lesson--that the line between appreciating animals and exploiting
them is tragically thin.--Noel Murray
|


|