 |
The Long, Hot Summer
JUNE 8, 1998:
You know you're in for a long, hot summer when the weather has hit 100 degrees
before the beginning of June. It's a drier heat, to be sure, but that blasted smoke
from Mexico hasn't helped matters. Last month was one of the driest Mays on record.
The only cure for the relentless heat sure to be ahead is self-indulgence and a good
book.
So, go ahead. Pick up your favorite trashy romance or thriller author. We won't shun
you, we'll only offer you some additional suggestions... Miss Manners, Cokie Roberts,
an ape named Ishmael, nostalgia, better parenting, fun fiction, and offbeat museums,
for starters. Cheers, jeers, fears, and tears. It's summertime and the readin' is
easy. --Margaret Moser
For once and for all, we simply cannot abide you telling us, "I don't know
the right thing to say." If all your drilling from your parents, your teachers,
and other assorted elders have failed to address the specific circumstances that
have left you embarrassingly tongue-tied, you now have the volume of Miss Manners'
Basic Training series clearly entitled The Right Thing to Say (Crown, $17
hard), just so there is no confusion as to the content of the tome. In her articulate,
precise, and screamingly funny style, Judith Martin provides, in bold type should
you miss it otherwise, the right thing to say in just about every circumstance.
What appears to have so many of us stumped is a two-fold problem: Some of us are
under the impression that we are required to concoct an original response to routine
situations while others are stupefied by the vulgarities we routinely encounter.
Both of these plights are solved for us. Specifically. Using her now-familiar and
successful format of topic introduction in an essay-type manner followed by actual
questions addressed to Miss Manners and her response to said queries, Miss Manners
provides the exact answers we seek. Now, it's up to us to practice these utterly
correct and, perhaps even more importantly, utterly useful responses.
Why is it that in our society so inundated with psychobabble that we all have
had ample practice in instructing our children to "use your words" or in
prefacing interpersonal dialogues with, "I understand how you feel" comments,
but we simply cannot make ourselves say, "Congratulations" on being informed
of someone's good fortune? See, it's simple. Now, try this: "I'm afraid I won't
be able to attend." Period. Their genius is in their simplicity. And I suspect
that is what trips so many of us up. We think we sound phony, or insincere, or like
we're lying when we leave it at that. In fact, as Miss Manners demonstrates, the
opposite is true. It is when we try to "improve" upon time-tested discourse
that we end up sounding like bumbling Neanderthals. As actors struggling to learn
their lines will attest, it's infinitely easier to just memorize the text rather
than attempting to rewrite the play every night off the top of your head. And so
it is with social discourse. Now, you've been provided your script. You're expected
to be off-book by Monday. -Barbara Chisholm
Author Richard Dooling ponders hefty issues of conscience, human motivations,
and hate crimes in Brain Storm (Random House, $25 hard), his well-paced,
scrupulously researched fourth novel. Dooling writes almost exhaustively on the particulars
of law, computer technology, and neuroscience, and it's almost miraculous that such
an intellectual endeavor manages to be so trashy. Or maybe it's the other way around.
Joseph Watson is the protagonist lawyer, appointed to defend James Whitlow, a
man accused of killing his wife's deaf black lover. Watson, who has no previous trial
experience, gave up his ambitions in criminal law and instead became a corporate
research lawyer to accommodate his money-hungry wife, because he loves her breasts.
Watson's quests for breasts is one of the central themes in the coming-of-age story
of his initiation into criminal law. His own run-ins with conscience (extramarital
sex and the illegal collection of a legal retainer) mirror what he is learning about
his client from the sexy neuroscientist Rachel Palmquist, who is often (and unfortunately)
referred to as the Brain Venus.
Palmquist devotes the small measure of her time that isn't occupied with strapping
Watson down, brushing her Lycra-clad orb of a breast against his face, or spewing
neurosexbabble into his ear to stating her case that conscience is an outdated notion
for Watson's client and, by extension, him. Watson, a computer geek in the throes
of being fired from his job, doing Internet research, having his wife leave him,
and being threatened by thugs, keeps thinking things that get the reader embarrassed
on his behalf: "[We're] Just a couple of high-end biological machines preparing
to hot-dock with cable modems and access each other's front-end processors."
In a way, the book serves more than one audience: For those interested in the
blow by blow of legal proceedings or the use of scientific evidence in court, the
book will be compelling. For those simply interested in the blow by blow of Watson
himself, you won't need a degree in science, law, or anything else to enjoy the book:
Contextual clues suffice to tell the story. -Meredith Phillips
George Orwell once wrote that writers are driven primarily
by an egotistical craving to see their thoughts and opinions expressed in print,
no matter what nobler intentions they may profess. So imagine the lodes of self-righteous
vanity that fueled newspaper editors in the Western pioneer settlements, where the
exercise of free speech could earn you a pummeling or a bullet wound. Libel laws
did not constrain these frontier publishers, but then again, courts seldom convicted
anyone for shooting them.
In Red Blood and Black Ink: Journalism in the Old West (Knopf, $30 hard),
David Dary argues for a reassessment of the contributions these pugnacious journalists
made in settling the West, chronicling their fortunes, their crusades, and their
eventual adoption of Eastern newspaper styles. But as a drowsy read on the front
porch, the book's most engaging content is the acerbic, metaphorically rich language
that Dary has rescued from the archives - likely some of the most free-spirited,
unshackled commentary ever to be set in print. Disagreements over politics or competition
with rival papers begat fusillades of personal insults, sometimes keenly barbed,
other times astonishingly profuse. (Ever been called a crank-sided, blobber-lipped,
snaggle-toothed, filthy-mouthed, box-ankled, reel-footed Black Republican? Or been
pronounced "so fearfully low down and utterly despicable... that the very dogs...
would pass him by, and cross a country writhing with agony, in search of a cleaner
post"?)
The expert displays of calumny and vituperation flung about by these men (and
women) inevitably lead to boisterous confrontations: shoot-outs in newsrooms, presses
thrown bodily into rivers, and editors dipped in molasses and grass burrs. Dary occasionally
finds humor amid the umbrage, however, such as the moonlighting newspaperman who,
as the editorial writer for rival crosstown newspapers, would assail his own character
from one pulpit and then respond in kind from the other.
Of course, this book is not all spittin', cursin', and fightin', since Dary is,
after all, out to show how newspaper editors engaged the more sober, everyday lives
of their readers. Then as now, gossip columns, humorous anecdotes, and other "puff"
pieces were often crucial ingredients for a paper's survival. Academic historians,
however, have largely ignored Old West newspapers, an oversight Dary attributes to
prejudiced disregard for journalists who did not conform with today's standards of
objectivity or political correctness. But anyone who appreciates virile wit, colorful
metaphor, and cantankerous polemic will thank Dary for mining this neglected era
of journalism, rough edges and all.
-Kevin Fullerton
Leaving a Doll's House (Little, Brown & Co., $13.95 paper),
the title of Claire Bloom's latest memoir (she wrote an apparently less candid memoir
some years back titled Limelight and After) gives the reader the false sense
of security that this is the story of a woman who frees herself from the boundaries
and servitude of her existence. In reality this juicy, if somewhat polite, tell-all
has the repetitive chorus in Bloom's personal life of: Nit-Wit Woman, Moronic Choices.
This autobiography recounts the parade of great roles (which she recalls with professionalism
and tact) and the far more incredible parade of notorious men. While the cast of
characters ensure a gossip-monger's interest (Richard Burton, Laurence Olivier, Rod
Steiger, Yul Brenner) what emerges as the most incredible aspect of these alliances
is the repetitiveness of the monumentally stupid choices this dame makes.
Claire Bloom makes A Doll's House's Nora look like Betty Friedan. Bloom uses
the wisdom learned in these many dalliances in her most notable relationship: that
with über-author Phillip Roth. But one has to sympathize with her: How could
she possibly know what a misogynistic psychopath he would turn out to be when her
only clues were Roth's insistence that Bloom throw her daughter out of Bloom's
house because he couldn't stand to live with the daughter (Bloom obliges), and his
novel Deception which features a "remarkably uninteresting, middle-aged
wife, who, as described, is nothing better than an ever-spouting fountain of tears"
who happens to be an actress named Claire and who is repeatedly betrayed by
the promiscuous writer Roth names Phillip while living in the house owned
by Claire which he shares with her family he describes as self-hating? And
Bloom displays her sensitivity by proclaiming she understood and sympathized with
her daughter's hurt and anger at being turned out of her own home by her own mother
at a dipshit boyfriend's insistence. I guess that daughter is the sensitive type.
While all these carryings-on will leave you slack-jawed with incredulity, they
will also have you turning those pages. What could possibly be next? Bloom's writing
style, while dishing all this sordid dirt, is paradoxically ladylike. Her trashing
of Roth has none of the scorch-earth policy Julia Phillips undertook in her Hollywood
memoir You'll Never Eat Lunch in This Town Again. An ideal Barton Springs
read, this memoir leaves the reader with that heavenly feeling of smug, self-righteous
indignation. -Barbara Chisholm
In Ruth L. Ozeki's My Year of Meats (Viking, $23.95
hard), Japanese-American would-be documentary auteur Jane Takagi-Little is the
director of My American Wife!, a television show intended for Japanese consumption
and sponsored by an American beef consortium, Beef-Ex. With unintentional hilarity,
My American Wife! showcases a different wife and a different meat recipe ("Pork
is Possible but Beef is Best") in a different region of America each week. Watching
the show in Japan are millions of housewives like Akiko Ueno. Akiko, abused spouse
of Beef-Ex advertising executive Joichi "John Wayne" Ueno, watches each
episode of My American Wife!, dutifully grading it for Authenticity, Wholesomeness,
and Deliciousness of Meat. Between these two characters lies a whole world of women,
a world that includes cheated-on Idaho housewives, 10th-century Japanese novelists,
and aging Texas beauty queens.
Out of this cast of thousands, documentary filmmaker Ruth L. Ozeki has in her
first novel created a story that is by turns funny, wrenching, and ultimately emotionally
healing. My Year of Meats, is, in short, damn fine and has much to recommend
it, not the least of which are its two main characters. Jane Takagi-Little is tough,
generous hearted, and always believable in her attempts to follow her own moral compass.
The interludes with her counterpart Akiko are almost too painful to read. But the
author gifts Akiko with an engaging, if nascent, sense of the ridiculous and a fair
measure of courage, making her one of the more likable characters in the book. Ozeki
uses a keen sense of story and pacing to shift smoothly from Akiko's point of view
to Jane's. Even though these two characters have no contact until the middle of the
novel, Ozeki skillfully uses episodes of My American Wife!, which Jane directs
and Akiko watches, as well as excerpts from The Pillow Book by 10th-century
author Sei Shonagon, as mutual points of reference between these two divergent storylines.
Along the way, she also works in unexpected asides from minor characters and the
occasional well-timed flashback. It's a risky stratagem, but it works. What could
be confusing is instead bracing, and never esoteric or obscure.
My Year of Meats deals with the film and television industry, which means
that it deals with the hipper-than-hip world of images. And yet, just like its main
voice, Jane Takagi-Little, My Year of Meats is hip on the outside but romantically
and idealistically passionate on the inside. Ozeki manages to inform the public of
some of the meat industry's nastier secrets and at the same time meditate on the
larger implications of love, sex, and fertility in the latter part of the 20th century.
No mean feat, that. Of course, I'd be fibbing if I didn't note some of My Year
of Meats' weak points: Ozeki seems unwilling to examine the dynamics of her major
male-female relationship too closely, and there are points in the narrative that
feel a little contrived, either for the purpose of laughs or the purpose of tugging
on a reader's heartstrings. But the book as a whole is so generous, is so bent upon
giving its readers so much in the way of ebullient characters, buoyant life, and
a vital story, that its weaker points are easy to forgive. My Year of Meats
is an open-handed gift, a nervy kick in the pants, a warm embrace from a stranger
who somehow knows you very well indeed. -Barbara Strickland
Deviance comes in all forms, the most compelling being those unrestrained, imaginative
impulses that have contributed thousands of little museums, strange museums, and
unofficial museums to the American cultural landscape. Containing the obsessions
of the passionate collector, these cathedrals of excess testify to the unbridled
power of Pack Rat Fever.
Little Museums: Over 1,000 Small (and Not-So-Small) American Showplaces
by Lynne Arany and Archie Hobson (Henry Holt, $17.95 paper) lists over
1,000 tiny and decidedly unofficial museums around the United States. Organized by
state, the authors provide a brief description, hours of operation, and contact information.
As a comprehensive reference manual and travel tool, Little Museums should
be on the dashboard of every quirky cross-country wanderer.
However, the authors omit their own point of view in favor of objective descriptive
blurbs. So there is really no way to know whether it would be worth the trip, say,
to exit the New Jersey Turnpike and visit the Trash Museum which lays out the natural/unnatural
history of the New Jersey Meadowlands or if the Cockroach Hall of Fame in Plano would
beckon louder. But, then, what might be heaven for the authors could be hell for
you.
For Austinites, Little Museums offers several destinations offering intriguing
introductions to these public displays of personal obsession which often illuminate
the curator's psychology more brightly than the histories displayed. In San Antonio,
anthropologists of the extraordinariness of everyday life can check out Barney Smith's
Toilet Seat Museum or the Buckhorn Hall of Horns; the Church of Anti-Oppression Folk
Art; the Hertzberg Circus Collection; and the Magic Lantern Castle Museum.
The type of traveler who always takes too long to get somewhere, who rejoices
in getting lost, and who strikes up conversations with anyone who promises a good
story will delight in the crap shoot that Little Museums offers.
If you're a Janis Joplin fan, you'll be heartened to know that Port Arthur's Museum
of the Gulf Coast boasts a shrine of Janis stuff, from spiritual childhood artwork
to her stage attire and memorabilia. Some might say that having shunned her as an
outcast and a disgrace, Port Arthur should erect a more significant monument - on
the scale of, say, Mount Rushmore. But that sort of opinionated interpretation will
have to be made by the reader who actually visits the listed sites. -Ellen Spiro
Kate Summerscale's The Queen of Whale Cay (Viking,
$21.95 hard) is the slim, hilarious, and fascinating biography of "Joe"
Carstairs, a wealthy British heiress to the Standard Oil fortune who claimed when
she grew up that she didn't know her parents' names. She was once the world's fastest
woman on water, counted the Duchess of Windsor and Marlene Dietrich among her friends
(though Dietrich was something more than a "friend"), and was obsessively
devoted to her little leather doll Lord Tod Wadley. That rare heir who is nonetheless
a relentless entrepreneur, Carstairs said goodbye to England in 1934 and bought Whale
Cay, one of the Bahama's Out Islands, after she saw an ad in an American newspaper.
She bought the nine-mile-wide by four-mile-long island for $40,000. But then perhaps
defining Carstairs by her actions isn't right for someone for whom "the question
of quite what she was never seemed to concern [her]: she knew that she was something
else, and that delighted her."
When she took possession of Whale Cay, she was not the first foreigner to try
and tame it. She hired seven men from Nassau to lay down a road, and worked right
alongside them. "I don't think anything is worthwhile unless you fight for it,"
is how Carstairs saw the world. For example, one morning while laying down that road,
Carstairs and her men saw a snake. In fact, they were all eating lunch "when
she slipped a knife from her belt and hurled it at a snake. 'And by God I cut that
goddamn snake's head right off.' The men were deeply impressed, and from then on
all the islanders called Joe 'The Boss.'" You can bet they did because "when
the island dog, John, died, Joe had him stuffed and put in the museum. She occasionally
threatened her employees with a similar fate." She wasn't just an autocratic
ruler of her Banana Republic, though; she was able "immediately to forget wrongs
done her," and she was financially generous to many friends, lovers, and former
employees and their families, providing them all with annual incomes.
Carstairs is a figure who lurks about in cultural shadows: Here she is driving
ambulances in WWI Paris, probably running into Hemingway; there she is having an
affair with Marlene Dietrich or Dolly Wilde, Oscar Wilde's niece. She offered her
ships to the American and British navies during WWII. She instituted the paternalistic
and misguided Colored League of Youth, which attempted to teach Carstair's employees
and the entire black Bahamian youth population the virtue of self-improvement. She's
a contradictory person whose "projects were so outlandish that they took her
beyond fame and notoriety to obscurity." Just the kind of life that absolutely
merits the close and spirited examination given it by Summerscale. -Claiborne
Smith
Now that we're old enough to be nostalgic, it's good to have a book like Retro
Hell: Life in the '70s and '80s, From Afros to Zotz (Little, Brown &
Co., $12.95 paper) around. Compiled by the authors of the popular zine Ben
Is Dead, Retro Hell is an amusing encyclopedia of such essential pop culture
artifacts as: birthstone rings, Pop Rocks, "James at 15," Dynamite
magazine, Shields & Yarnell, and much more.
The book must have been a blast to make, with each major entry including brief
editorial asides from the editors. In Retro Hell you'll find reverent descriptions
of icons like Bigfoot, the Planet of the Apes films, the "ABC After-School
Special" and Casey Kasem's "American Top 40." You'll also be pleased
to find such forgotten faves as Sid and Marty Krofft, painter's pants, Wacky Packages,
and "calculator games" (who can forget the can't-fail "shelloil"
joke?).
Put to the test, this is a fairly exhaustive collection. Although Retro Hell
includes no dedicated entries for Evel Knievel, the Hudson Brothers, the "John
3:16" Guy, or CBS' "In the News" with Christopher Glenn, all of these
and other essential pop references do indeed turn up inside other listings. As for
the annotated remarks, sometimes they're right on the money (the entry for Sara
T - Portrait of a Teenage Alcoholic is perfect) but beware - they're generally
more personal than factual, so be prepared to run across entries that are unfunny
or that just plain don't belong here (lame entries regarding "best friends"
and "thumb sucking" come to mind).
If you're between the ages of 25 and 39, you'll find Retro Hell to be an
entertaining but uneven trip back to your own childhood. This collection is a meandering,
good read that - to be great - would have only needed an editor who'd have cut the
weaker material and made damn sure Bert Convy made it in.
-Stuart Wade
Forget King Kong. Forget Joe Young. Forget Peter Tork. The mightiest maven of
hermeneutical philosophical mayhem is Daniel Quinn's great simian Socrates, Ishmael,
the gentle anarchist prophet of ecological disaster. The hero of Quinn's Ted Turner's
$500,00 Tomorrow Fellowship Award is back in a sequel that offers yet more startling
interpretations of the origins of our cultural morass. Ishmael, published
in 1992, offered a brilliant reinterpretation of the Cain and Abel Genesis story.
In that dialogic novel the great ape posited, more or less, that the agricultural
revolution was the true culprit in the Genesis story. Quinn convincingly argues that
the spread of agriculturalism's one-way paradigm destroyed the hunter-gatherer paradise
that had more than sufficed as a meaningful way of life for humanity for countless
thousands of years. The novel is now taught in schools and on campuses throughout
the world and has been translated into nearly a dozen languages. It has spawned any
number of discussion groups and Quinn recently moved from Austin to Houston to better
coordinate the series of seminars he conducts on how to change the world using the
principles established in Ishmael and now this current book.
Quinn's My Ishmael: A Sequel (Bantam, $23.95 hard) isn't so much
a sequel as a simultaneous other story that takes place alongside the original. Between
visits from the original student, Alan Lomax, Ishmael takes on a 12-year-old girl
named Julie Gerchak, the precocious daughter of a divorced alcoholic mother. But
just like Ishmael, plot line really isn't an issue. Sure, he provides a more
satisfying ending than the original which, for all its play as a positive solution
to global problems, was really quite the downer, but essentially we're talking a
Socratic dialogue here with the ape as Socrates and Julie as a latchkey Plato. It
is nonetheless as nail-biting a page-turner as any contemporary bestseller. More,
it provides the kind of reasoned, accessible critique of our hell-bent-for-Armageddon
culture as you're ever likely to get. Written in an amazingly clear and concise manner,
My Ismael will appeal to a proto-Marxist Chomsky critic as well as the inner-city
gang-bangers for whom Quinn has an abiding affection.
But therein lies a problem. Ishmael had some critics, but environmental
concerns are much more politically safe these days. We still have much work to do
but everyone can agree we need a planet to survive. In My Ishmael Quinn takes
on the educational system (abolish it), the law ("Thou Shalt Not" will
never work), economics (when they locked up the food we lost our freedom), and religion
(all of the major religions are based on food lock-up and "Thou Shalt Not").
He also slags the New-Age healers and those who believe the natural state of man
is to suffer.
This ape sets up a sacred cow shooting gallery and pops 'em one by one with a
clarity that is frightening. Most frightening of all - drum roll, please - he doesn't
offer a prescribed solution. He doesn't say computers or capitalism or consumerism
are bad; he doesn't say we have to give up anything. In fact, we should ask for more
of what we've lost in this agricultural exchange: more sanity, more safety, more
community, more giving, more choices, more dialogue. This is one radical ape Quinn
has unleashed on the world.
Still, I'm reminded of Quinn's joke about the man who jumps off the Empire State
Building. As the man passes every floor he says to the people staring from their
windows: So far so good, so far so good. That man is our culture and the ape is trying
to teach us how to build an airplane before we hit the pavement. So far so good,
so far so good. - Ric Williams The Man Who Stole the Mona Lisa by Robert
Noah (St. Martin's, $22.95 hard) is an imaginative, fast and loose adventure through
the circumstances that might have led to the Da Vinci painting's famous theft.
Our hero in question is the Marquis de Valfierno, a rogue and small-time grifter
who has fashioned himself into faux loyalty out of the rubble of his lower-class
birth. Charismatic and unscrupulous, he makes his erratic fortune by passing off
imitation masterpieces for the real and stolen things. This he accomplishes with
the assistance of Yves Chaudron, a failed artist who must find glory in shamelessly,
yet flawlessly, mimicking the inspired masters.
Predictably, the Marquis is indeed the brainchild behind the mysterious, seemingly
motiveless two-year capture of da Vinci's master work from the Louvre. In broad,
comic strokes, Noah paints the years leading up to the improbable heist as well as
the cast of eccentric characters that join him in his epic foray. But Noah's tale
is less a story of art history or criminal intrigue than a gentle nudge at human
fallibility. With every caper, the Marquis is able to convince powerful men of seemingly
impossible things, not because he is an expert in his field (he isn't), but simply
because their need to believe in each artwork's authenticity and their own tendency
to pretend to know more than they do. Like any swindler, the Marquis knows a stroke
of luck is just as effective as stroking the human ego.
But Noah also calls into question the somewhat arbitrary values we place on art
- if the power of a piece of artwork comes in its suggestion of the infinite, or
in its breathtaking hold on the truth, why aren't Chaudron's knock-offs as valuable
as the real thing? Especially if they grant the same pride and awesome potency of
the original. Imminently readable, full of goofy escapades and clever twists, The
Man Who Stole the Mona Lisa is a poke at human vanity that feels just right.
- Sarah Hepola
I did not want to know this about Cokie Roberts. To my mind, Cokie is an erudite
goddess of careerism and effete graces. I had followed her, proudly, from National
Public Radio to ABC News and finally to Sunday's This Week talk-o-rama. I
had rooted for her against those crying "sellout" when her speaking fees
reached the tens of thousands. I believed in Cokie. And if it weren't for this sopping
memoir with the patronizing title We Are Our Mother's Daughters (William
Morrow, $19.95 hard) I might have remained rapturously ignorant.
First of all, it turns out Cokie is no kind of self-made woman. She's got D.C.
blue-blooded credentials going back generations and drops phrases such as
"At a party my parents gave for Lynda Johnson's wedding..." like stinkbombs.
Basically, when Cokie graduated Wellesley there was no trouble finding a Washington
internship, and she probably didn't have to sleep with LBJ to get it. So shattered
my up-by-the-old-bootstraps Women's Movement mythos.
Worse still is her well-greased grade toward what can only in 1998 be called A
Quaint Feminism. No doubt in a study lined with partly charred and tastefully framed
brassieres she has written possibly, hopefully, the last of the self-congratulatory,
man-hating tomes. The best image of the whole sticky mess is a tear-jerker about
the natural history museum in Marathon, Greece (where the family summers, by the
by) which she uses to alpha and omega her personal philosophy. Full of ancient needles,
buttons, and frying pans inexplicably symbolic of the "great strength of women,"
the museum stirs in Cokie a harpy's shriek. "What was left from the lives of
the men? Objects of war and... of worship, recognizable for soldiers and priests,"
which give none of the continuity connecting women throughout time by a sisterhood
of what? Needles and buttons? Dear Cokie, next time confine your archeological ruminating
to the arcana with which you are so obviously intimate - the Seventies. -Kayte
VanScoy
"As Mrs. Stewart darkly observed her family, the hotel, the guests, the staff,
and the entire state of Virginia... she found that turmoil and disintegration were
as usual predominating." So goes a signature line from Nancy Lemann's recent
novel The Fiery Pantheon (Scribner, $22 hard), a slyly comic
book in which damn near every character is craven, feckless, ignoble, tragic, hopeless,
or doomed, and every empire on the verge of collapse. It is around such lost souls
(and fallen empires) that The Fiery Pantheon revolves: Mrs. Stewart, with
her morbid psychoanalysis and love of disaster; the romantic Grace, smitten by the
indisputably honorable and utterly tragic; and the young businessman Walter, perhaps
most lost among the lost souls, who smolders aimlessly throughout the book's global
itinerary. Even the hotel orchestras are lost, stocked with "fascinating tortured
Europeans" whose modest attempts at Cuban rumbas are "overladen with Hungarian
melancholy."
It is also against such a backdrop of elegant ruin that Lemann unleashes her buoyant
prose and trademark wit, bringing with her an unassuming air and a devilish perception
of Southern idiosyncrasy. Indeed, it is Lemann's well-crafted prose, possessed of
a comic redundancy and a fondness for improper proper nouns (Crusty Old Bastards,
for example, or Wild Brooding Agony) that is the selling point of The Fiery Pantheon.
The book fairly floats on top of her fresh and often manic writing - enough so
that it is easily possible to get well into the second half of the book before realizing
that it's a bit thin on both plot and character development. Without those structural
supports, The Fiery Pantheon becomes not much more than a clever exercise,
its appeal fading about the time the lost souls embark on a whirlwind tour of famous
fallen empires. Some needless globe-hopping ensues - as if Lemann had been to a lot
of odd places and wanted to publish her witty opinions of same - and the romantic
imbroglio than enlivens the first half of the book peters out a tad lamely. The last
30 pages proceed seemingly without purpose before Lemann manages a quick knot from
the loose ends. Give Lemann more credit for language than for plot - but to her credit,
that language alone is enough to make The Fiery Pantheon a suitably amusing
read.
Even less amusing is Reynolds Price's dour old bag of a novel Roxanna Slade
(Scribner, $25 hard), a book almost as dark as Lemann's but twice as long and
without the sense of humor. Roxanna Slade has a great first sentence ("Every
time somebody calls me a saint, I repeat my name and tell them no saint was ever
named Roxy"), but descends from there into an often trudging tale of loss and
compromise, told from the vantage-point of the ninetysomething Roxanna Slade. If
Mrs. Stewart's doom-laden but witty observations about Virginians are the tagline
for The Fiery Pantheon, Roxanna Slade's is provided by a dress-making
spinster named Betsy: "wait'll you taste how cruel God can get." In among
some rather windy passages about nothing at all, Price seems determined to lay bare
that cruelty, inventing a lead character beset by common tragedies that leave her
depressed and often tormented, "teased out of the crowd by a long hot finger,"
in her own words, and "fried in anguish." Despite Slade's admirable
stoicism, keen observations on race, and a fine line about biscuits, Roxanna Slade
is a generally somber, often boring, and altogether serious book, given to
italicized moralizing and theological hand-wringing. Heaven help us.
Price seems to realize as much: Not quite midway through Roxanna Slade,
the titular narrator begins apologizing for her somewhat uneventful life story, admitting
that her life is more a "drab-colored village event" than "the official
state fair with charming lights and music and giants." Oh, but what if it had
been the official state fair, with music and giants and cotton candy and Tilt-O-Whirls
and common carnival trash and too many cherry Slushees and quick stolen kisses behind
the 4-H bleachers? Why, then we'd have a summer novel on our hands. Instead, we're
fried in anguish, just waitin' to see how cruel God can get, unwilling participants
in a drab-colored village event. If you must read it, wait 'til October. -Jay
Hardwig
Set A Patchwork Planet by Anne Tyler (Knopf, $24, hard)
on top of your summer reading list and visit it as fast as you can. It's gracefully
written, easy to get into, and as engrossing as her recent Ladder of Years
and Saint Maybe. Tyler, who won a Pulitzer Prize in 1988 for Breathing
Lessons, doesn't use shock tactics and improbable plotlines to make her point
- she puts human emotions under a microscope.
Planet's narrator is a 29-year-old former juvenile delinquent named
Barnaby Gaitlin. He calls himself "the oldest living undergraduate" and
works for Rent-A-Back. This is an organization that provides elderly citizens strong
backs for difficult tasks. Barnaby's parents think that he is still "finding
himself."
Barnaby's career as a manual laborer is an embarrassment for his absurdly wealthy
Baltimore family. Barnaby's only assets are a run-down Corvette Sting Ray, an ex-wife
who despises him, and a daughter he barely knows. His family is anxious to welcome
their black sheep back into the flock with a job at the family philanthropy, The
Gaitlin Foundation. That notion is anathema to Barnaby, who wants no part of a daily
suit and tie.
As a juvie, Barnaby was infamous for breaking and rifling. He broke in but skipped
the liquor and valuables. Instead, he read diaries and love letters and looked through
family photo albums; he pocketed baby pictures instead of baubles. Barnaby's mother
still can't forgive him for embarrassing her in front of the neighbors even though
his years as a delinquent are far behind him. When the book opens, Barnaby is slacking
and waiting for his angel. This wait isn't the result of reading too many new-age
self-help books; Barnaby's angel is a hundred-year-old family tradition. To find
his angel he follows a blond woman in a feather print coat that he spies on the train
to Philadelphia. To tell more would give away the plot.
An intensely satisfying book, A Patchwork Planet is already on the New
York Times Bestseller List. And deservedly so.
In contrast to the polished and well-executed Planet, The Student
Body (Villard, $23 hard), written by a committee known as Jane Harvard, is
dreck. If only the publisher had sent them one of those skinny rejection envelopes!
Jane Harvard consists of four Harvard graduates of the class of 1986, and it's
easy to understand why they've published under an alias. While you don't have to
admire the book, you do have to admire their collective achievement, as the book
shows few signs of its multiple creators. Inspired by a real-life prostitution scandal
at Brown University in 1986, the group started writing a book to pay off their student
loans and to entertain themselves. They should have stuck to selling plasma and drinking
beer.
The Student Body is a Harvard-obsessed mediocre thriller that nonetheless
has an engaging premise: A prostitution ring is staffed by Harvard coeds and perhaps
even condoned by the financial portfolio committee of the Harvard administration.
What an administration! Not only do they stand in the way of good journalism, they
look the other way when a biomedical firm they're investing in tests a virility drug
via the special "Veritas" condoms that the coeds assiduously apply to their
mates. Truth and Viagra, after all, are what work.
Problems with The Student Body include the assumption that the reader needs
no introduction to Harvard particularities and traditions, characters pulled from
a literary paint-by-numbers, and authors who have forgotten the old saw of "show,
don't tell." The most memorable scene, though, is an amorous encounter between
the African-American narrator Toni and her Boston Brahmin babe Cabot. The supporting
character Cabot is the most engaging and appealing figure in the book, perhaps because
he was never explained with a heavy hand. The only thing I took from plowing through
The Student Body was a crush on the fictional Cabot. Look for it soon on remainder
tables everywhere. -Anna Hanks
If you're a new mother (or a mother-to-be) it means you are reading, reading,
reading everything you can get your hands on about pregnancy and parenting. But if
you're not white, married, professional, heterosexual, and/or middle class, honey,
you are out of luck when it comes to finding material that's geared toward you. My
own current favorite "mommy" writer, Child magazine columnist Vicki
Iovine (of the really fabulous Girlfriends' guides to pregnancy and motherhood),
as funny as she is, speaks from a purely Suburban-driving, personal-trainer-using,
nanny-hiring point of view. Even the What to Expect... "bibles"
of baby-making and baby-rearing are aimed mostly at the sensibilities of Granola
Mommy and Daddy - and although full of good answers, they're deadly dull to read.
But Ariel Gore, publisher of the alternative parenting zine Hip Mama and
a 28-year-old single mother of one, is filling that gaping-wide niche with aplomb.
Her Hip Mama Survival Guide (Hyperion, $12.95 paper), is an unapologetic
manifesto for mothers who'd probably sooner slash the tires of a Suburban than ride
in one. Gore wittily handles the usual motherhood dilemmas, such as staying sane
during pregnancy ("Don't hang out with anyone who makes you feel like shit"),
breast-feeding ("Remove your nipple rings"), and coping with toddler tantrums
("Call your local loser politician and scream in his answering machine about
his latest pathetic move").
But where Hip Mama really excels is in areas where the other parenting
manuals do not tread - such as debunking the whole "family values" myth,
confronting depression and neurosis, combating poverty, and riding through divorce
and child custody battles. Gore's description of her blood-boiling encounter with
Newt Gingrich when she was a panelist on MTV is priceless, for example. For all his
talk of initiating dialogue with the American people about welfare and family values,
Gore realizes that Gingrich's garrulousness is the real weapon. "With Professor
Gingrich there is no debate. There is only education," she writes.
Appropriately enough, then, Gore (a former welfare recipient) offers some smart
strategies for ensuring one's eligibility for public assistance (always say you know
no one to help you), eluding creditors (kite a check if you have to), and coming
up with quick cash (return that clothing from J. Crew, no matter how long ago you
bought it). No, Gore's delightful book is for bike-riding "mamas," not
Suburban-driving mommies. As her own hippie parents probably used to say, "Right
on, sister." - Roseana Auten Feel like catching up on your murder-mystery
lag? Here's three books from ongoing mystery series that you won't want to miss.
Against the Brotherhood by Quinn Fawcett (Forge, $23.95 hard) is a new addition
to the Sherlock Holmes canon. To avoid the wrath of Sir Author Conan Doyle's fans,
the hero is Mycroft Holmes, Sherlock's older, smarter brother. Fawcett's addendum
to the Sherlock Smorgasbord, the first in a planned series of Mycroft Holmes novels,
has been authorized by Dame Jean Conan Doyle, the first time such a favor has ever
been granted. I've never been a big fan of the Sherlock Holmes stories. PBS' Sherlock
is a brilliantly British but infernally conceited twit who is a damn sight too smug
for me. He comes off like that smarmy truant with a 1600 on his SATs. His older brother
Mycroft is the same way, smarter than the reader, and he can't wait to rub it in.
Mycroft comes up with just as improbable conclusions as Sherlock does. Theirs is
a world in which a detective can infer a wealth of facts based, say, on a spoon sticking
out of a waistcoat pocket. This isn't detective work; it's voodoo.
Against the Brotherhood is narrated by two minions of Mycroft, his butler
and new secretary. Burdened with the name Patterson Erskine Guthrie, his secretary
is nonetheless perfectly likable. Guthrie has lucked into a job with Mycroft shortly
after leaving school: one hell of an entry-level coup. Like a Victorian James Bond
tale, Against the Brotherhood is a busy novel filled with unlikely connections,
plots to take over the world, beautiful and dangerous women, and Victorian special
effects, which means that Mycroft injects a temporary tattoo that Mycroft injects
under Guthrie's skin. This tattoo allows Guthrie to pass muster as a member of the
evil brotherhood.
In contrast to this studied business is Dreaming of the Bones by Deborah
Crombie (Scribner, $22 hard). This altogether more poetic Duncan Kincaid/Gemma James
novel is concerned with murders both new and old. Duncan is called up by his ex-wife,
a literature professor now known as Dr. Victoria McClellan. McClellan is working
on a biography of the late poet Lydia Brooke. Brooke was a talented writer, but after
several unsuccessful suicide attempts, was seen as a flake. McClellan believes that
despite Brooks' record, the poet did not kill herself and wants Duncan to reopen
the five-year-old case. As expected, Duncan isn't particularly interested - until
Victoria herself is killed. The pertinent question: Was Victoria killed out of petty
departmental rivalry or because of her controversial biography of Lydia Brooke?
An Educated Death, by Kate Flora (Forge, $23.95 hard) is also set
in academic surroundings, but this time the setting is a private high school where
pregnant student Laney Taggert falls through the ice of a pond one evening. Thea
Kozak is called in to investigate. Kozak is not officially a detective, only a private
school consultant called in to investigate the school's security measures. But one
investigation leads to another, and it isn't long before Kozak is asking the kind
of questions that lead to a poisoned after-school snack.
Kozak is a fairly engaging investigator, much like Kinsey Millhone in Sue Grafton's
A Is for Alibi series. Like any female detective, Miss Kozak must have a male
protector who doesn't want his sweetie getting hurt. Luckily for Thea, despite boyfriend
Andre's old-fashioned ideas, he's easily the hunkiest sidekick on this murder-mystery
block. -Anna Hanks

|







|