 |
Bush: The Book
By Amy Smith
JUNE 1, 1999:
"Why," Bill Minutaglio wants to know, "do people think I'm writing
an authorized book on George Bush? I've had Rolling Stone and alternative
weeklies from all over calling to ask me if it's true."
Oh, those vicious rumors. Minutaglio knows a thing or two about them. He is, as
he stresses with some frustration, writing an unauthorized book on Bush, and
he has the dirt to prove it. But Minutaglio, a Dallas Morning News writer
for 16 years, knows that by the time Random House's Times Books releases his book
later this year, most of the Bush sex-and-drugs babble will have already petered
out on the pages of the mainstream papers. Which is just as well, because Minutaglio,
who last covered welfare issues from DMN's Austin bureau before taking a leave
of absence, is devoting more ink to Bush's psyche than he is to the juicy stuff anyway.
"The Random House editors wanted to avoid a deep, inside, tell-all-from-Texas
book," he says. "They thought he was an interesting guy in his own right."
Minutaglio began his investigation, with assistance from researcher Jordan Smith
(who writes for the Chronicle), in New Haven, Conn., Bush's birthplace. He
worked forward from there. "In shaping the book, I studied the characteristics
of Bush's grandfather, Sen. Prescott Bush, and explored what brought [George W.'s]
parents to Texas," Minutaglio says. "I, like many other people, have heard
all the rumors and I tried to explore them, with varying degrees of cooperation from
people. I also tried to measure these rumors in some way and found them to be an
interesting media phenomenon. But I think Clinton has set the bar so high -- or so
low -- we now have the Wall Street Journal writing, on page one, about the
[Bush] rumors and how they got started. I think what I ended up with overall, apart
from the rumors, is an actual portrayal of George Bush's life."
More intriguing than the rumors, Minutaglio found, were the stylistic differences
between Bush and his father. "The son is actually a better politician for this
era than his father was. He's a much more fully evolved politician. Like him or not,
you have to admire his political skills. He operates at a higher level than most
people. He has an engaging personality to the point of disarming political foes --
even some members of the media who are extremely liberal."
This is the point where one might expect Minutaglio to enthuse that, while Bush
is a nice guy, he's a bit of a clod. But noooo. "People mistake that
gregariousness for lack of political sophistication," Minutaglio goes on to
say, "but he didn't emerge in a vacuum. It's a mistake to look at him as someone
who's being carried along by some wave, with no input. He's a lot savvier than that."
Then, Minutaglio changes his tune. "His biggest weakness right now, while
it's not a big revelation, is that perhaps he is more like his father than people
realize. He's not an ideological politician. He's no Al Gore, certainly. He's not
a policy wonk. It's become a real cliché that Bush lacks the vision thing."
Nor is it a secret, Minutaglio adds, that Bush, the able student, is now preparing
a vision, or at least brushing up on how to present that vision.
"To be honest, I don't really know if lacking vision is enough to keep people
from voting for him," Minutaglio says. "He is extraordinarily popular in
Texas and a pretty effective governor. But he didn't get to be governor by being
a nice guy."
Bush, in fact, used to refer to himself as the "loyalty monitor" when
he worked on his father's presidential campaigns. "He's been known to chew out
reporters and admonish them on behalf of his father. He can be as tough and mean
as he can be nice. That's been a hallmark throughout his life."
How hard was it to research a book on Bush? Not surprisingly, the difficulties
grew larger as the Bush camp's interest in the book grew keener. And just as every
investigative reporter experiences varying degrees of paranoia when snooping into
someone else's business, Minutaglio, too, underwent periods of excessive wariness
and distrust. "It was just a general feeling I'd get every once in a while,"
he says. "There were a lot of previously helpful people who would suddenly become
unhelpful. Or there would be some documents I would seek through open records, and
I'd be told they would be available to me -- suddenly they became unavailable. They
would just disappear. Things like that made the process all the more laborious."

|



|