 |
Dying and D.I.Y.ing
New playwrights take their shot
By Chris Davis
MAY 24, 1999:
The Senate
I gripped the photocopied script tightly in both hands and it
began to tear down the middle as the director proceeded to mock
me openly, listing loudly and in painstaking detail why his theatre could not produce the play. "Do you know how much it
costs just to air condition the theatre?" he inquired, then he
rattled off a number of other expenses that could never be met
should the theatre's seats be empty come showtime. "Maybe if it
was turned into an Academy Award-winning film we could do a script
like that here, but until then " He trailed off and my heart sank.
The script in question was Angels Fall by Lanford Wilson, a Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright whose drama Burn This was at the time New York's hottest ticket. "I'm sorry," he said
at length, clasping my shoulder, "but nobody around here knows
who the hell Lanford Wilson is." Those were hard words for me,
an aspiring young playwright, to swallow. If Lanford Wilson couldn't
draw a crowd, what hope could I possibly have of ever seeing my
own work produced on a stage? "Nowadays," as Oscar Wilde once
"people know the price of everything and the value of
nothing."
Producing original plays is not just risky business; it is outright
commercial suicide. New works by unknown scribblers seldom attract
much of a crowd, and one can hardly blame our regional theatres
for playing it safe. Yet, if the American theatre is to exist
as anything other than a government-funded vending machine, new
plays must be produced. It's the old "no risk, no gain" conundrum
and it is the single most important issue in contemporary theatre,
ignored by those with the most to lose, and championed by those
with nothing.
The Forum
My introduction to Playwrights' Forum, Memphis' only theatre company
dedicated entirely to producing original material, came in the
early '90s in the form of a bitchy quip from a fellow thespian.
"Oh, you mean the Howell Pearre Repertory Company?" my friend
asked incredulously when I suggested a trip to TheatreWorks (South
Main incarnation) to see what the then-new group had to offer.
The recently deceased Pearre's scripts were indeed the foundation
on which Playwrights' Forum was built, but nearly a decade later,
their seasons are chosen from hundreds of scripts, which pour
in from all over North America, and from as far away as England.
In spite of the independent company's unprecedented longevity,
audience attendance is still spotty. The core members, however,
which include such stalwarts as Mary Bell, Gene Crain, and Laurie
Cook, remain committed to the cause. "We invested all the money
we made from Love Letters [the '93 fund-raiser starring Kathy Bates], so we aren't rich,
but we don't have to scramble for money like other small companies,"
says Bell of the Forum's current situation. "We are now receiving
a much higher caliber of plays and can focus our energies on giving
them the best possible productions."
The Forum begins its ninth season with The Swan Queen and the Radical Faerie by Canadian dramatist Frank Canino. SQatRF is Angels in America without the angels. In Canino's world, art has replaced the heavenly
creatures of Tony Kushner's ground-breaking epic, and it is the
touchstone that brings the two main characters (both doomed by
terminal illnesses) together. Taking on issues of politics, aesthetics,
and sexuality, the playwright attempts to redefine the concept
of family for the modern world. It is an ambitious piece, but
in its current state it is deeply flawed. Rather than digging
deeper and deeper into his subject matter as the play progresses,
Canino tends to repeat himself. Though the primary characters
(a cancer-stricken ballerina turned socialite and her stepson,
an AIDS-stricken avant-gardist) are often compelling, they are
surrounded by stock characters and forced into some very trite
situations.
Structurally intriguing, but plagued by clunky dialogue and too
many literary references for its own good, SQatRF benefits most from its abstracted realism and its powerful optimism.
It has a good deal of potential (perhaps as a network movie) but
still needs a great deal of editing.
In the Coliseum
At the Court House Deli, Memphis actor/playwright
David Thornton performs a series of Eric Bogosian-inspired
monologues collected under the title Crashing Buses.
At its worst, his script becomes a preachy outpouring of youthful
idealism and naive social commentary. At its best, however ("The
Rape Monologues"), Thornton offers up violent love poems reminiscent
of Sam Shepard's enigmatic collaborations with performance pioneer
Joseph Chaiken.
Still fairly fresh from college, Thornton's worldview is still
coming into focus, and he is the first to admit it. "I wanted
to do a play that was completely political, but I realized I didn't
know enough about politics," he confesses in a recent conversation.
"It's all about not being lazy," Thornton says matter-of-factly
when questioned about the difficulties of producing indie theatre.
"Not being lazy and accepting whatever you can get as far as space
and lighting goes. I'm buying clip lights because I'm poor. You
can bitch about what you don't have, or you can take a tiny little
room that nobody knows where it is and give it your best shot.
I want this to be a tool to get more activity going locally --
independently. There are ways to get it going here, and I'm finally
to find that out."

|



|