 |
Exhibitionism
APRIL 6, 1998:
CHILDREN OF CHILDREN: THE
FACES AND VOICES OF TEEN PARENTHOOD
Witte Museum,
3801 Broadway, San Antonio, through May 10
"I am 32 years old.
I was a teenage parent.
I have been lonely until today."
-- note tacked up on the public bulletin board in the "Children of Children"
gallery
I got home from the opening of Michael Nye's photo exhibit
"Childrenof Children" at the Witte Museum in San Antonio determined to
inspire as many people as I could to see it. I've already been back myself with three
girlfriends in tow, and have made standing offers to friends to babysit their kids
any night they choose to drive down. I am certain this outstanding exhibition will
go on to be seen around the country, and probably be preserved in book form as well,
but it will never be more immediate and intimate than it is now, in these twilit
teal-blue galleries in the artist's (and many of the subjects') hometown.
"Children of Children" is a group of 48 black-and-white photographs
of teenage parents. About half of the subjects are in their teens now and half are
older; "Luz," in fact, is 100 years old. In addition to the teen parents
there are photos of "Sid," father of a teen mom, and "Jerri,"
the now-grown eldest daughter of a 15- and 17-year-old who went on to have nine more
children. (Yes, this is Austin's own writer/designer/persona fabulosa, Jerri
Kunz.)
Michael Nye is best known for his elegant, often unutterably moving portraits
of adults and children from troubled or impoverished areas around the globe: Siberia,
Chiapas, Kurdistan. His subjects are presented lovingly but unsparingly, wreathed
in a hyper-clear, intense naturalism, sometimes complicated by elements of artifice.
For example, in this show, many subjects are photographed in front of a backdrop
unrolled in a street or a yard. Some are blurred, some are seen through a keyhole.
Some self-consciously display articles of clothing, photographs, or figurines; others
choose anonymity with their backs to the camera or with hair in their face. Some
are seen with partners, others with parents, others, like the hearbreakingly innocent
and beautiful "Becky," with their children.
If this were just a show of photographs, it would be phenomenal. But the pictures
are only half of what's offered here. Beneath each image is a pair of headphones,
and when you put them on, you hear the voice of the subject, making a statement from
two to five minutes in length about his or her experience with teen parenthood. As
it turns out, the way Nye listens is similar to the way he sees -- with a rapt,
meticulous attention that gives pre-eminence to the natural voice, infusing it with
poetic resonance. He honors the stories the way he honors faces, and in doing so,
gives us almost shockingly immediate access to a stranger's humanity.
As you listen to the stories, staring into the speakers' eyes, the meaning of
the show quickly transcends its stated topic. Teen parenthood becomes a window through
which all of life is seen: love, courage, family, aspiration, sorrow, and abuse,
the way a destiny takes shape, the interplay between fate and will. There are so
many stories I will never forget, but let me tell you just one. The 53-year-old black
man called "Cowboy" tells of his mother, a full-blooded Chippewa who had
16 children and died when he was six. "I would have given anything if she could
have lived longer," he says, the yearning still audible five decades later.
When his father died shortly after, his brothers and sisters traded him to a white
man to pay for his parents' funeral. There he lived in a mud shack with no electricity,
beaten by this man "every Saturday, Sunday, and a lot of times on Thursday,
too," as well as for fun whenever friends came over. At 18, he was taken to
an all-black school for one hour a day. There he met Alice, his first friend. "She
was like an angel," he says. When 14-year-old Alice got pregnant, he was sure
the man would kill him. Cowboy saw no alternative. He got a gun and went to the man's
house to kill him first. But when he arrived, the wife told him he was too late.
The man had taken sick and died.
It was a miracle, he explains. He believes in miracles. For him, teen parenthood
was a miracle that saved his life.
Many lives here were not saved by teen parenthood -- some are sadly broken.
"Katherine", a two-month pregnant 15-year-old, tells us, "If I weren't
pregnant, I would be playing ice hockey, football, or bungee jumping." "Esther"
tells of her high school friends calling up and making giggly conversation about
diapers and baby care: "It's not as much fun as they think it is." The
judgments faced from family and society are often severe, and the teen parents are
frequently hard on themselves. No matter which ones you listen to, you cannot help
but be moved. Even the night of the opening, so crowded and festive, people stood
shoulder to shoulder with those headphones on and tears rolling down their cheeks.
The photographs have been hung in pairs, with the stories for both recorded one
after another on a shared tape unit. Because this createssuch interesting juxtapositions,
I assumed it had been an artistic decision. Nye explained that while it may have
added something, it actually came out of financial concerns. He rejected most potential
sources of funding for this show because the money came with an agenda -- a preset
idea of the conclusion the show should offer its viewers. He certainly avoids that.
Not only does the show not offer any pre-packaged attitude about teen parenthood,
it is as rich as life itself.
--Marion Winik
OUR OWN DEAR ANTON'S ABANDONED STORY CYCLE:
BUTTING HEADS PHYSICALLY
AND METAPHYSICALLY
John Henry Faulk Living Theatre, through April 5
Running Time: 2 hrs
All they wanted was an ending to their story. For 100 years, they'd accepted being
characters in a tale abandoned by its author, left to exist without any sense of
what their ultimate fate might be. The author would never pick up their story again;
he was dead, for pity's sake! Why should they not try to end the story themselves?That's
all they were trying to do. How were they to know that endings were so... complicated?
Alas, for poor Burkin and Ivan Ivanich, the two characters left in literary limbo
when Anton Chekhov left unfinished the novel in which they were featured, taking
their story into their own hands winds up being considerably more frustrating than
they expected. They start out figuring stories to be docile cattle that will turn
in whichever direction the storyteller desires. But their venture into the field
shows stories to be more like wild horses that are likely to carry their riders (writers?)
through brambles or dark woods or anywhere else the animals choose to run. As they
come to realize how little control they have over this horse they're riding, Burkin
and Ivan Ivanich respond with varying degrees of irritation, dismay, alarm.
Their vexation, however, is our elation. Playwright Joseph Skibell has penned
these protagonists as old-school buffoons, figures at odds with the worldaround them
whose efforts to cope with it -- almostalways doomed to disaster -- prod
our sense of folly and make us laugh. The ways in which Burkin and Ivan Ivanich butt
heads, stumble, and flail about -- physically and metaphysically -- are the
stuff of classic comedy, in every sense of that term.
They're given breath and bone by artists with a keen sense of what it means to
embody that kind of comedy. Director David Yeakle has a clown's soul; his understanding
of humor at its most basic and wonderful seems innate and his appreciation for its
traditions in theatre as deep as it gets. He has mined this script for every spot
that can yield a take, a bit, some shtick, and allowed his actors the opportunity
to make the most of them, which they do. Steve McDaniel infuses Burkin with quickness,
both of wit and of temper. He can fire off a smart remark like a crack shot in a
duel and get fired up in indignation like a match head soaked in gasoline. His expressions
of exasperation have the vividness of a comic strip character's; you can almost see
coiled black lines spiraling from his head. Todd Lowe's Ivan Ivanich is rather less
quick, his grasp of a situation always seeming to take a moment to seep into his
consciousness. His slow dawnings of realization can be very amusing, as when he's
forced to play a woman then finds it liberating; Lowe ever so gradually shifts his
countenance from consternation to delight. Michael Stuart's Vladimir joins the pair
to help them in their search for closure, fitting into their stories as misanthropic
coffin maker, unrequited lover, whatever. Stuart's impeccable timing and enviable
comic range get full play, with the actor tossing off bullish bluster one minute
and mousy vulnerability the next and scoring laughs handily with both. Individually,
the performers are crisp; collectively, they are air-tight, taking and passing off
bits to each other like a team of expert jugglers: Nothing ever falls. And given
the amount of literary and philosophical humor Skibell gives them to handle and the
wealth of tightly timed bits that Yeakle adds in, that's a testament to their skill.
After some two hours of searching for an ending to their story, Ivan Ivanich and
Burkin decide that endings are overrated. Why not just enjoy the story you're in
the midst of? If it's good, who wants it to end? That's a sound sentiment for life
and one with which viewers of this smart, funny production will no doubt identify.--Robert
Faires
|


|