 |
Collected Bunch
"Word Virus" contains just a tenth of William S. Burroughs's writings, but it's enough to get a full sense of his career.
By Gary Susman
FEBRUARY 8, 1999:
WORD VIRUS: THE WILLIAM S. BURROUGHS READER. Edited by James Grauerholz and Ira Silverberg. Grove Press, 576 pages, $27.50.
You can cut into Naked Lunch at any intersection point," wrote William
S. Burroughs in the "Atrophied Preface" to his groundbreaking 1959 novel.
Having dispensed with such reactionary conventions as plot, characters, and
complete sentences, the book was a string of hallucinations, black-comic
sketches, and nightmare images of the violation of every possible taboo, held
together only by the author's oracular voice and the theme of addiction as an
analogue for all human relationships. One could read the book beginning
anywhere and take any few pages as a fractal representation of the whole.
In fact, Burroughs, who died in 1997 at age 83, could have made the same
observation about his entire body of work. You could cut into it at any point
and pull out a representative passage of bleak brilliance. Over the decades,
his subject was always, ultimately, the topography of his own consciousness,
and his method -- whether in the journalistic straightforwardness of his
earliest prose, the deliberately random fragmentation of Naked Lunch and
the novels that followed, or the surreal spins on narrative of his late work --
was always pedagogical: instruction on how to frustrate the mechanisms of
control that rob us of our freedom.
Which is why the compilation of a Burroughs anthology is at once a simple and
a daunting task. At more than 500 pages, the new Word Virus: The William
S. Burroughs Reader contains only about a tenth of his published work
and is one of any number of possible anthologies that would be similarly
emblematic. Some of Burroughs's writings are clearly better than others, and
some are undeservedly obscure; what's new to the casual reader may seem
overexposed to the hard-core fan. In order to please general readers, fans, and
scholars, Word Virus editors James Grauerholz and Ira Silverberg, both
long-time associates of the author, have set themselves the unenviable
assignment of trying to include both the greatest hits and the most relevant
excerpts from a lifetime of work (see "Just for Jolly," next page).
Inevitably, they will have failed to include passages close to somebody's
heart. (Among those I miss are the author's prediction of human devolution into
a "crustacean horror" in Junky and Naked Lunch's "The Algebra of
Need," Burroughs's most lucid depiction of human society as a pyramid of
exploitative relationships.) Conversely, a few passages that did make the cut
are interesting but of dubious necessity. Still, the editors have done a
remarkably successful job of collecting the essential passages and assembling
them in a larger context that insightfully traces Burroughs's career of
stylistic restlessness and thematic constancy.
The primary theme running through both his life and his work was resistance to
all threats against personal liberty. For Burroughs, these included not only
politics, technology, and drugs, but also language itself. In a passage from
The Ticket That Exploded that gives this book its title, he wrote, "The
word is now a virus. . . . The word may once have been a
healthy neural cell. It is now a parasitic organism that invades and damages
the central nervous system. Modern man has lost the option of silence. Try
halting your sub-vocal speech. Try to achieve even ten seconds of inner
silence. You will encounter a resisting organism that forces you to
talk."
Even in his earliest work, Burroughs was wise to the ways language tended to
enforce patterns of thought and to how he might subvert the text. In the most
notable of the book's handful of unpublished early rarities, the short excerpt
from 1945's And the Hippos Were Boiled in Their Tanks -- a novel with
chapters written alternately by the 31-year-old Burroughs and his new friend,
23-year-old Jack Kerouac -- Burroughs is already transforming his life into
fiction and painting detailed portraits of the underground types whose lives
demonstrate an alternative to straight society. Burroughs and Kerouac never
published the novel, for the now-apparent reason that it wasn't very good, but
in this case and a few others, Grauerholz and Silverberg have decided to favor
historical worth over literary merit.
What varied throughout Burroughs's career was his approach to deprogramming
language. The early books consciously use the streetwise jargon of their
outsider characters, whose elusive definitions leave meaning in play. In
Naked Lunch, he discarded most narrative conventions in order to
collapse time and simulate chaos. He generated actual randomness in his
"cut-up" works of the '60s, in which he would arbitrarily splice phrases from
other texts and other authors into his new works. Having taken these Dadaesque
experiments as far as they could go, in the last decades of his life he turned
to spinning outrageous twists on familiar adventure genres (tales of high-seas
piracy, ancient lost cities, Western shootouts), as if to rewrite history and
determine the point at which humanity took the wrong path. Having excerpts from
every stage of Burroughs's career makes it easier for both newcomers and
long-time devotees to trace particular phrases and images that recur throughout
the author's mythology, gaining meaning and resonance along the way.
This evolution is laid out clearly by Grauerholz, who was Burroughs's
companion and editor for the last 23 years of his life. He presents the pieces
more or less chronologically, divided into eight periods, and he has written an
introductory essay for each period that helpfully fixes all the works in the
context of Burroughs's life. He does, however, make some assertions of
questionable accuracy. For instance, Grauerholz places Burroughs, his brother
Mort, and Gore Vidal at the same high school in 1930, though Vidal would have
been only five then. He also writes that after Burroughs completed his
queer-rebellion novel The Wild Boys: A Book of the Dead in August 1969,
"the following month, as if to confirm that Burroughs had his finger on the
pulse of gay futurity, the Stonewall Riots occurred in Greenwich Village."
Actually, they occurred in June, two months before Burroughs finished the
manuscript.
Also questionable is the book's implicit granting of equal weight to each
period. Does the mishmash of essays and sketches Burroughs wrote in the '60s
and '70s deserve as much space as the formative years of the '40s and '50s,
when Burroughs wrote Junky and Naked Lunch? No, but otherwise the
book would miss such obscure gems as "The Beginning Is Also the End," "The
American Non-Dream," and "A Word to the Wise Guy," all helpful lessons from the
old outlaw to a culture in revolt that was finally catching up to him.
Many of the selections in Word Virus are read by the author in a CD
that is included in the book's first printing. These readings are taken from
last year's four-CD boxed set The Best of William Burroughs: From Giorno
Poetry Systems (Mouth Almighty Records). Listening to Burroughs's canny
vaudevillian delivery has always been one of the best ways to get into the
satirical intent of his often arcane passages. For those new to Burroughs, the
CD, like the book, is an excellent introduction; for fans, both book and CD
will serve as fond keepsakes from an old friend.
Just for jolly
In a typical bit of perverse humor, a dying William S. Burroughs wanted to name the anthology of his work after a purported quotation by Jack the Ripper. "William had this idea that the book should be called Just for Jolly, which came out of some Jack the Ripper book he was reading and was the response to the question posed to Jack the Ripper, 'Why'd you do it?' 'Just for jolly,' " recalls Ira Silverberg, who
conceived and co-edited the anthology with James Grauerholz, Burroughs's
literary executor and long-time companion.
Instead, Silverberg and Grauerholz came up with Word Virus, a
career-summing title that alluded to Burroughs's vision of language as an
invading, thought-corrupting organism and to his lifelong battle to turn
language on itself. Says Silverberg, "Eventually, William said, 'Fine,' "
and approved the manuscript one week before he died in August 1997, at 83.
Silverberg, 36, had known Burroughs "my entire adult life," had once served as
his publicist, and in his capacity as editor in chief at Grove Press relished
the opportunity to return Burroughs to the imprint that had published his most
seminal work, starting with Naked Lunch. In compiling Word Virus,
which contains about a tenth of what the Beat godfather published during his
lifetime, Silverberg says he and Grauerholz balanced excerpts that were fans'
favorites with lesser-known -- and sometimes lesser-quality -- but thematically
representative work (notably, the previously unpublished And the Hippos Were
Boiled in Their Tanks, a very early collaboration by Burroughs and Jack
Kerouac). Says Silverberg, "The objective was to create a book that would give
a new reader a taste of what the body of work was like, and to give a more
studied reader a map of the work as seen through certain concerns William had,
stylistic changes that took place, to create a continuity of vision through
theme and character. It was a really difficult task. James knows William's work
better than anyone in the world. He can read it aloud from memory. The
challenge for him was what not to put in. For me, who knows the work but not in
a scholarly way, I wanted to take the William I knew and loved and get it out
there. I wound up looking for the best possible work, and James wound up
looking at my selections and creating the connective tissue that ran through
the book.
"It is a 'best of,' but it's also work that best represents his literary,
political, spiritual concerns. That was the task, to keep the flow alive, so
that by the end of the book, you'd realize, 'Shit! This man changed as the
years went on. This man was actually a bit softer, to the extent that he was
looking for solace at the end of his life' -- but be able to reflect back on
earlier work and see those concerns manifest themselves in a different way. The
reason we included a chapter of Hippos is that that work is in many ways
a prequel to Junky and Queer. It is the very beginning of what
was the hard-boiled style of those years. In retrospect, it is perhaps some of
the most immature work William ever wrote, but we felt it was really important
to show the trajectory of where he was going."
Indeed, the book shows that Burroughs spent most of his life railing against
all forms of thought-control and prophesying doom in a sly cackle, but it also
shows that, unlike most satirists, he mellowed with age. Silverberg says that
Burroughs confounded the expectations of those who knew him only through his
explosive early books like Naked Lunch or his notorious personal life of
drugs and guns, which came together tragically when the author accidentally
killed his wife, Joan, during a drunken game of William Tell. "The mythology of
William Burroughs is so much greater than the truth of William Burroughs.
Having known William intimately as a friend my entire adult life -- yes, he was
this great writer and this incredible visionary and this wonderful influence on
the culture at large, but he was actually a terribly sweet man who was walking
around with emotional baggage that, toward the end of his life, he wanted to
reckon with. That's why the introduction to Queer [which Burroughs wrote
at age 72] is in there, which is one of the most important pieces of personal
writing William ever did in his life, dealing with the death of Joan. But
again, if you look at the books, especially the Red Night trilogy, you
see the beginning of William looking for a way out. He was always looking for a
way to transcend the human condition, and as he got older, it was about
reckoning before transcendence. That was one of the most important parts of
editing this book for both of us, to show he was human, he was frail the way
we're all frail emotionally, that he was not hard and cold and mechanical. He
was a far more complicated human being and a far more complicated writer than
he was thought to be.
"At the end of his life, he wasn't bitter at all. He was very happy. He
enjoyed a brilliant retirement for a man who had really suffered for years and
years and really dealt with poverty. That's another myth, the Burroughs
millions. [Burroughs's grandfather invented the adding machine.] The family
sold the stock years ago, and the small trust fund he lived on ran out when he
was rather young. At the end of his life, he found more financial success. I
remember Allen Ginsberg always coming back from his trips to [Burroughs's home]
saying, 'God, I wish I had it as easy as Bill.' William had a very leisurely
schedule. He'd putter around, do some work in the garden, do some painting and
some writing. Allen had one of these schedules where he was working from
7 a.m. to 2 a.m. It was great for William."
Burroughs wrote until the last day of his life, leaving behind a journal of
his final year called Last Words that Silverberg hopes to publish within
the next couple of years. Notes Silverberg, "At the end of his life, he wasn't
even using a typewriter. He was writing by hand [arthritis made typing
painful]. He never worked on a computer and had no interest in a computer. He
didn't give a shit. He was very old-fashioned in his way."
Yet Burroughs long ago foresaw the Internet, and he continues to provoke
responses in fans' newsgroups and Web pages. Silverberg, a casual reader of
such postings, says, "The thing that intrigued me the most is how many women
leave messages. There's still this myth that Burroughs is a boys' writer, that
the element of misogyny that some say exists in his work -- I question if it's
true misogyny or if there were just certain routines that were blown out of
proportion. It just proves that the work hits more people than ever.
Gary Susman is a contributing writer to the Phoenix.

|



|