BACK IN THE good old days of serial killers, everybody
knew they were just evil weenies. I fondly recall a movie titled
The Hitcher, in which Rutger Hauer chased C. Thomas Howell
all over the highway just to taunt him. It was a silly, dumb,
brutal movie, the sort that would prevail at drive-ins and that
nobody would ever mistake for art.
That's not to say I recommend The Hitcher. The film sickened
me, actually, because it goes to all the trouble to create a compassionate,
loving female love interest (played by Jennifer Jason Leigh) just
to senselessly kill her off and give the audience a jolt they
won't soon forget. I guess it worked.
Movies like The Hitcher still exist, but they're smarter
and sneakier, and sometimes they even try to convince you they're
art. These movies take on subdued names like Seven and
star Oscar-winning actors like Morgan Freeman. They feature lush
noirish cinematography and pack their stories full of references
to Dante, Chaucer, Milton, Shakespeare, Hemingway and other literary
giants. In between gruesome slayings, these films try to convince
you that it all means something.
And Seven--short for "the seven deadly sins"--is
good enough that it almost succeeds. Screenwriter Andrew Kevin
Walker and director David Fincher go to great lengths to detail
the philosophical attitudes of retiring homicide detective Freeman
and his reckless youthful partner, Brad Pitt. Parallels are drawn
between Freeman's cynicism about the sickness of society and the
motives of the serial killer. Troubled questions arise: Is the
fight for good worth fighting? At what cost? And so on.
Of course, all of this takes place in a world of such studied
visual darkness that you can't help but feel there must be some
deep themes hiding in the corners someplace. The movie is all
flashlights and lovely, shadowy mutilated corpses, like a two-hour
tour through all the storage rooms Jodie Foster didn't visit in
Silence of the Lambs.
You might recall that director Fincher was the guiding mind behind
Alien3, which turned Alien's boogeyman story into a parable
of sin and redemption and turned Sigourney Weaver's Ripley into
a combo Christ/Virgin Mary symbol. You might also recall that
none of this added up to anything, and the movie wasn't very scary,
either. Well, at least Seven gets the scary part right.
The movie's serial killer is as menacing as they come, to the
point where even the sight of what might be him standing down
the hall generates a freakish apprehension. He's played by Kevin
Spacey, who apparently gets a big kick out of playing "my-brain-is-bigger-than-yours"
types. His character in Seven isn't that smart though;
instead of wearing gloves to prevent fingerprints, something even
O.J. figured out, Spacey cuts off his fingertips. And his murders--which
punish people for lying, dealing drugs, knowingly spreading disease,
and so on--don't exactly amount to a provocative social statement.
(Then again, I'm biased because I just read the Unabomber manuscript.
Wow.)
The most useful thing you can say about Seven is that
you will never again forget the Seven Deadly Sins. Before the
movie, I heard people in the audience trying to remember them:
"Uh, greed, and anger, and um, wrath, and pride, and vanity,
and avarice...I'm missing one." For the record, they're Gluttony,
Greed, Sloth, Vanity, Lust, Envy and Wrath. (Does anybody know
what the Seven Cardinal Virtues are? I'd like to see that
movie.) By the way, if you're interested in seeing a terrific
movie featuring the Seven Deadly Sins, I heartily recommend the
Faustian comedy Bedazzled starring Dudley Moore, Raquel
Welch (as Lust) and the late, great Peter Cook as the devil himself.
Despite its art, Seven is little more than an elaborate
and rather clever puzzle piece. The whole point of the movie's
existence is to neatly fulfill the killer's desire to punish each
one of the sins in an artful way. I might have been more impressed
by Seven's success at achieving this mechanical, exploitative
goal if the film hadn't created human characters for me to care
about. Seven is like an artsier version of The Hitcher,
complete with a gruesome stomach-turning death, but it's a much
worse film because it tries to fool you into thinking there's
a meaning behind the madness.