THE FIRST TEN MINUTES of almost any movie contains some
sort of conflict--it's a filmmaking rule, designed to hook the
audience. Usually it's a murder, a fight, a kidnapping, a car
chase or an explosion, but in The Flower of my Secret (La
Flor De Mi Secreto), the latest film from Spanish golden-boy
director Pedro Almodovar, the story begins with a refreshingly
mundane problem: Leo (Marisa Paredes), a middle-aged wife pining
for her absent husband, has put on a pair of boots he gave her,
and she can't get them off.
Almodovar, known for his unconventional, rule-breaking style,
has almost gone normal with The Flower of my Secret. He's
suppressed his customary unpredictability in favor of the conventional
elements of melodrama--love, betrayal, a woman in tears--all with
a disquieting undercurrent of illogic. For example, after Leo
struggles with her boots for a while, she tries in vain to contact
someone to help her out. Her maid has the day off, her husband
is in Bosnia, so she goes to her friend Betty's workplace to ask
for aid. There, Betty (played by Carme Elias) scolds her for being
so fragile and unable to take care of herself, a characterization
that sticks to Leo for the rest of the movie, though all evidence
points to the fact that Leo is practical, not fragile. Her boots
hurt, she couldn't get them off so she asked a friend to help:
What's so unsteady about that?
The Flower of My Secret continually stacks well-observed
and arresting bits of everyday life next to melodramatic moments
and illogical turns of character so that it becomes tempting at
times to lose patience with the trials of the heroine. Leo is
desperately in love with her husband Paco (Imanol Arias), a sexy
but cold fellow who joined the U.N. peacekeeping force in Bosnia
to escape the rubble of his failing marriage. Though his wife
still loves him to distraction, he's pretty much sick of her.
On his only day of leave he drops by just long enough to tell
her their marriage is finished. The next day her best friend drops
some more devastating news.
Much of the story chronicles Leo's journey from a frightened,
dependent wife to a confident and self-sufficient woman, and the
ride can be a jerky one. Her initial self-hatred takes many forms,
including drinking and drugs, but the most interesting dig involves
her dual identity. She writes romance novels under the name Amanda
Gris, and one of her first tasks at her new job as a literary
critic is to pen a scathing critique of her own work.
Here, again, we are met with illogic, or at least a significant
gap in the world of the film. Leo's repulsion at writing "pink"
love stories with happy endings is understandable in light of
her failing marriage, but her stubborn need to remain anonymous
as the enormously popular author of the Amanda Gris novels is
never explained. Almodovar is fascinated by the idea of dual identity,
and the theme of hiding oneself, or having a secret self, is threaded
throughout the film without ever addressing the central question:
Why on earth is Leo so adamant about maintaining her secret identity?
We never get close to learning, though a friend of hers, an Amanda
Gris fan, does find out who she is--"the flower of her secret"
he calls the discovery, quoting Amanda Gris. The way this phrase
is a perfect romance novel, euphemistic double-entendre for all
things vaginal, is never really dealt with, in the same way that
the melodramatic aspects of the film are never really processed.
With all the love-sickness and betrayal, Almodovar is clearly
taking his cue from the great Hollywood melodramas of the forties,
but it's unclear if The Flower of My Secret is an homage
to the form or a take-off on it. Almodovar's comic sense is suspiciously
absent here, and it's difficult to tell just how serious he is
about all this.
This question might not come up with any director other than
Almodovar, who is known for portraying a ribald, out-of-control
world in films like Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown.
Now that he's strayed into serious territory, it's difficult to
decide whether to take him seriously or not.