Back in 1989, my college "Intro to Cinema" class had a guest
speaker--Georgia filmmaker Tucker Johnston, who had just completed his
debut feature Blood Salvage. He related the long history of the project,
which he had begun four years earlier, when the horror genre was still
booming. The plan at first was to crank out a quick, cheap feature as a way
of getting his name out in Hollywood. As the years dragged on, however,
Johnston found more and more doors slamming shut, and eventually the
completion of his movie become a matter of habit and determination more
than a matter of ingenuity. It would be nice to say that his story was
inspirational, but as we sat and watched scenes from Blood Salvage--which
starred Ray Walston and Evander Holyfield--the tale seemed mostly
pathetic.
Switchback has similar origins. It began in 1984 as a script
called Going West in America, the first effort by 28-year-old film
student Jeb Stuart. The screenplay didn't get made right away, but it got
Stuart more work--within a decade he had put his name on Die Hard
and The Fugitive and worked behind the scenes on a pile of other
action movies. He never lost sight of his first baby, though, and when the
project came out of turnaround for the umpteenth time in 1995, Stuart
struck a deal to direct. Upon viewing the final product, however, one
wonders why Stuart bothered.
Not that Switchback is a bad movie. In fact, it has some
interesting ideas. Dennis Quaid stars as an FBI agent on the trail of a
serial killer who has abducted his son. Meanwhile, an ex-doctor (Jared
Leto) and a journeyman laborer (Danny Glover) travel West past the
scattered crime scenes. Both have mysterious pasts, and either could be the
killer, but Quaid's investigation of the duo is stuck in a small Texas town
embroiled in a bitter sheriff's election.
The small touches--the election, and the interplay between Leto and
Glover--are obviously what caught Hollywood's attention over a decade ago.
The weaker spots--like the hackneyed and soft-headed serial killer thread,
and a plot full of amazing coincidences and impossible holes--are why the
script has gone unfilmed for 13 years. One wonders why Stuart didn't take a
few minutes here and there to fix some of the problems. (Like maybe he
could've come up with a reason why no one had been able to identify Quaid's
son in the months since he'd been missing.)
Of course, that's the problem with pet projects--their masters live with
them so long that they have no perspective. The dirty secret of artistic
creation is that it's not really a finite process: It ends when the
deadline arrives or when the creator gets tired of sweating. With unlimited
time and unlimited patience, a writer could go on and on, putting in
whatever happens to be on his mind on any given day.
It's obvious that Switchback is exactly what it was when Stuart
finished it in 1984--the same gimmicky combination of road movie and
thriller, with even the same overwritten train-chase finale. That he still
wanted the movie produced is only natural; that he didn't feel up to
improving it is no surprise. Some call that perseverance. Others call it
vanity.