The original Speed was my kind of action movie--made on the
cheap, with minimal star power and an emphasis on premise, character, and
tone. Speed backed up its killer hook--a bus that explodes if it
dips below 50 mph--with personable characters and a well-observed sense of
absurdity. Thanks to Jan de Bont's unpretentious direction and Graham
Yost's taut script, we in the audience knew within moments exactly what
kind of people our heroes were, and we had a rooting interest in seeing
them through their predicament.
Speed 2: Cruise Control cost three times as much as its predecessor, and
it's about a third as good. Keanu Reeves, whose monotonous intensity was
put to good use in the first film, has been replaced by Jason Patric, who
employs the same monotone with none of the intensity. Speed's snappy
premise is AWOL as well. The action this time is aboard a luxury liner that
has been programmed by the villainous Willem Dafoe to smash into an oil
tanker while he zips away with a fortune in jewels. He needs the money to
cover medical costs that his employer refused to provide--even though the
company poisoned his blood with copper before it fired him.
Did you follow all that? I almost didn't. Dafoe announces his motive
over a loudspeaker, and whenever his explanation starts to sound dubious
(like the whole "copper-in-the-blood" angle), returning director Jan de
Bont has another character step on Dafoe's lines or fire a noisy gun.
Obfuscation is de Bont's prevailing strategy for Speed 2, and
it's manifested primarily in shaky, hand-held close-ups. When Sam
Peckinpah's The Wild Bunch established the quick-cut action-film
style, each of the shots was at least well-composed and comprehensible. De
Bont's battalion of cameras produces sequences of shots that are blurred
and usually meaningless. The images are then cut together to give the
impression that the action is just too frenetic to absorb. Instead, the
effect is merely exasperating, even nauseating. (I recommend focusing on
the exit sign and watching the movie from the corner of your eye--although,
after a few minutes, that exit sign starts to look pretty good.)
Frankly, Speed 2 is a cheat; it's a sequel to a title, not to a
movie. Calling this mess Speed is like slapping a Coke label on a
bottle of water. The only real connection the film has to its predecessor
is the recurrence of ancillary actors such as Sandra Bullock, who reprises
her damsel-in-distress role for a new hero. Unfortunately, Bullock--whose
good-spirited anxiety seemed so real and so cute in Speed--has
little to do in the sequel but stand around and beg Patric not to risk his
life. And when she tries to act nonplused by the mayhem around her, she
comes off sounding infantile.
Bullock's big moments are reserved for romantic scenes with Patric,
during which they both spout inane dialogue in each other's general
direction. It used to be that we went to big movies to watch people more
urbane and more together than we could ever hope to be, but these days our
screen heroes sound like figures in a first-year Spanish textbook. ("I am
going to the beach. Do you have a dictionary?") This inanity stretches to
Speed 2's supporting cast, a fatuous bunch of vacationers who add
nothing to either the environment or the plot of the film (quite unlike the
bus passengers in Speed).
Maybe screenwriters Randall McCormick and Jeff Nathanson put all the
good stuff in their first draft--you know, stuff like action context and
character motivation--and de Bont cut it out before shooting began. Chances
are, though, that they all shared the same vision: to make a movie in which
nothing is happening, but it's happening at a breakneck pace.