I've always found something very sad about domesticated animals. When a
pet gets out into the open air, its first instinct is usually to trot off.
Left alone, they often forget themselves and occasionally get lost. That
doesn't bother me. What gets me is when they come back, or rather why they
come back. Is it because of some emotional attachment to the master?
Because they know where the easy food is? Or do they return to their homes
merely out of habit, because it's the only life they can imagine? None of
these prospects, not even the alleged bond, appeals to me. Pets are
charming and comforting, but contemplating a beast with a confused
nature--torn between freedom and routine--is hardly pleasant.
Caroline Thompson's film Buddy is about a woman who believed in
the absolute domestication of animals. The story is mostly true, based on
the life of New York socialite Gertrude Linz, who kept an incredible
menagerie on her sprawling estate--birds, horses, show dogs, and a handful
of chimpanzees. The chimps were her special project, and Linz felt that if
apes were treated as human children, they would grow up with intelligence
and nobility.
Rene Russo plays Gertrude Linz, in a winning and tricky performance. She
plays Linz as both ebullient and slightly crazed, but ultimately
determined, especially when she takes on an impossible task--raising a
gorilla from infancy to adulthood. Linz names the great ape Buddy and is
initially successful at forging a connection and training the animal to
behave politely and helpfully. Buddy, though, can't be restrained forever,
and it's not long before he starts losing touch with his affection for Linz
and begins feeling the urge to run wild.
It's easy to want to like Buddy. Thompson, who wrote the
script as well as directed, has her finger on a fascinating dilemma--the
difficulty in maintaining a communication with another species. She backs
up her story with painfully sad images. Buddy (played by a man in a gorilla
suit, with facial animatronics by Jim Henson's Creature Shop) dances alone
in his cage with Getrude's robe in his hands; Buddy, in butler's duds,
drops a deviled egg from a tray he's struggling to carry; Buddy sits in one
velvet chair after another, searching for one that he can settle into
comfortably. These are memorable, heartbreaking moments.
Unfortunately, Buddy's tone is all wrong. Thompson tries to
balance the fanciful and the sober--and to tell a true story to boot--and
the whole rickety thing collapses. By rigidly adhering to the facts of
Linz's own memoir, Thompson cuts herself off from plot developments that
could've strengthened her tale. What is Linz's relationship with her
impossibly understanding husband (played by Robbie Coltrane)? Why does she
insist on projecting imagined personalities onto her pets? Thompson also
raises the "yeah, right" quotient every time she shows her apes sitting
down to dinner at a table like normal humans. Any realism in these scenes
is quickly diluted by zaniness.
The larger problem, though, is that Buddy is ostensibly a
children's movie. This is a depressing and often scary story, about a
serious theme. To gear the film toward kids is a gross miscalculation, one
that betrays both the story and its young audience. More than one child at
the screening I saw left visibly upset by Buddy's sudden, melancholy rages.
And as a adult, I was put off by the film's slapsticky elements. Every few
minutes, there are annoying madcap antics by the chimps--as they wear
clothes and roller skate and generally undercut the very animal dignity
that the film tries so hard to build. It's as though Thompson is ignoring
her own lesson--that the line between appreciating animals and exploiting
them is tragically thin.--Noel Murray