The message were supposed to glean from Patch Adams is that laughter
is the best medicine. Too bad the laughs come from characters
onscreen, not from the audience. This is a feel-good movie that
will make you sick queasy with the realization that youve wasted
your money on this debacle.
Robin Williams stars as Hunter Patch Adams, a real-life doctor
who believes that clowning around with patients helps them heal.
The story of Adams career is indeed interesting and could have
made one hell of a documentary. Instead, director Tom Shadyac
and writer Steve Oedekerk a team best known for the Ace Ventura
movies chose to give this worthwhile tale the standard Hollywood
treatment.
Shadyac has said he wanted to do this film only if he could get
Robin Williams to play Patch. Unfortunately, he did. Williams
alternates between his compassionate/inspirational mode (i.e.,
Dead Poets Society, Awakenings) and his wild-and-crazy Mork persona,
and in either case its familiar shtick. His idiosyncrasies are
by now so ingrained and instantly recognizable that hes incapable
of playing anyone but himself.
Its hard to imagine the real Patch Adams could be pleased with
how hes portrayed here. In the film, hes a saint, devoting his
life to helping people and battling the mean old medical establishment,
which apparently exists to hurt people. It seems that until Patch
came along with his revolutionary ideas, no physician in America
had ever treated his patients as human beings. Oh, and by the
way, Patch is a genius, too he scores the highest grades in
medical school without ever having to study, so he has plenty
of leisure time to hang around hospital wards wearing an enema
bulb on his nose and a bedpan on his head, curing patients with
the force of his comedic brilliance. Stop, my sides are splitting!
Like many of the movies released during this holiday season, Patch
Adams is calculatingly packaged to manipulate the audience, substituting
sentimentality for genuine emotion and cranking up treacly music
to generate drama where none exists. The platitude-laden script
reaches its nadir at Williams big Oscar-moment speech, where
he actually uses the phrase as God is my witness. This is far
more hilarious than any of his zany antics.
The film might have been redeemed by a strong supporting cast,
but all of the characters are one-dimensional, as if to prevent
them from stealing any of the glory from Williams. As Patchs
love interest, Monica Potter looks remarkably like a young Julia
Roberts, but she seems lifeless, as if her vivacity has been surgically
removed.
The most insulting aspect of this movie, though, is its slapdash
construction. Its littered with anachronisms and egregious continuity
bloopers. The story is set in the early 1970s, yet people are
using things that simply werent around back then, like modern-style
telephone answering machines and HMO insurance cards. Throughout
his four years of medical school, Patch entertains the same group
of young cancer patients, who seem frozen in time they never
age, get better, or die. Theres even a scene in which Williams
is standing on a cliff and a dark object that can only be a boom
microphone is momentarily visible above his head. Where were the
editors?
Patch Adams is a well-intentioned film that turned out horribly
wrong. Equal parts blame should be assigned to the writer, director,
and Williams. The studio, Universal Pictures, also deserves culpability,
but the decent box-office returns may have misled the suits into
thinking that their product is actually good. Dont encourage
them further. Films like this are a plague on the movie industry
lets keep the virus from spreading.