Director Gillian Armstrong's Oscar and Lucinda is a frustration. It's
beautifully filmed with carefully staged, lovely images and terrifically
skilled performances. But in the final analysis, the picture never quite comes
together. We never get a handle on its characters, and the connection between
the characters' traits and their actions proves irksomely elusive.
Adapted for the screen by Laura Jones from Peter Carey's novel, Oscar and
Lucinda is the story of two people from different continents who are
brought together by their shared addiction to gambling. Oscar Hopkins (Ralph
Fiennes) is an English lad who grows up in a strict religious household. His
father (Clive Russell) is a Brethren minister who thinks that faithfulness to
God requires expunging all earthly joy. Oscar is deeply religious himself, but
he discovers physical pleasure in a forbidden taste of pudding and decides that
he can be just as worshipful as an Anglican. While at Oxford studying for the
ministry, Oscar discovers the joys of betting on horse races. He loves the
tingling excitement of the bet, and he comes to view every victory as a sign of
God's blessing. And God does seem to bless Oscar's gambling. The young man's
winnings enable him to live more comfortably, give presents to friends and
donate significant sums to the poor.

Lucinda (Cate Blanchett) and Oscar (Ralph Fiennes) can't
let themselves enjoy each other, while director Gillian
Armstrong doesn't let viewers enjoy her movie.
|
Meanwhile, in Australia, a young woman named Lucinda Leplastrier (Cate
Blanchett) inherits a vast fortune that provides her very little in the way of
happiness. Lucinda can find pleasure in only three things: ornamental glass,
conversations with her friend the Rev. Dennis Hasset (Ciaran Hinds), and,
eventually, gambling. She likes cards in particular. Lucinda might like to
develop her relationship with Hasset along romantic lines, but he disapproves
of her gambling and moves from Sydney to a distant rural parish.
Oscar and Lucinda meet on an ocean liner. She is returning from a trip to
London, and he is on his way to missionary service in Australia. They play
cards, and they fall for one another, but both are so emotionally clotted they
can't reveal their affection. They settle for a relationship of unspoken urges
and tolerated misunderstandings. Finally, this leads to disaster when Oscar
heads into the hinterland on a mission devised solely for the purpose of
winning Lucinda's already thoroughly won heart.
I have to believe that all this proved more exciting and cohesive in Carey's
Booker Prize-winning novel (which I haven't read). Armstrong is certainly a
talented filmmaker, as demonstrated by the strong critical reception she
received for such earlier films as My Brilliant Career and Little
Women. But she's not at all well served by Jones' screenplay. A host of
events are poorly constructed, and the whole feels hastily taped together.
Oscar doesn't think gambling is a sin, so why does he feel he has to go to
Australia to get away from gambling? How are we to understand Lucinda's
obsession with glass? By what logic does Oscar derive the notion that he can
win Lucinda's heart by delivering a prefabricated glass and steel church to
Hasset's congregation? And why does the idea excite Lucinda so? Why does the
trek to Hasset's parish take on the look of a military expedition? We know that
Oscar has an irrational fear of the sea, but he managed to make it from London
to Sydney, so why does he endeavor to reach Hasset's parish overland? Why does
expedition leader Mr. Jeffris (Richard Roxburgh) go out of his way to murder
aborigines in their own territory? And given the fact that Lucinda has promised
Jeffris a sizable bonus for delivering Oscar safely, why does Jeffris then turn
and try to kill Oscar? At the end, how are we to understand the actions of one
Miriam Chadwick (Josephine Byrnes), and why would Oscar respond to Miriam in
such a nonsensical way?
I have other complaints as well, but you get the point. I suspect that much
has been deleted and truncated from Carey's original story. We never understand
the behavior of this film's characters, and that's its undoing.