If there's one thing I hate to do, it's jump on the bandwagon.
Ever since the audacious porn industry opus Boogie Nights
opened the prestigious New York Film Festival a couple months
back, film critics nationwide have been falling all over themselves
praising it as the film of the year. But, you know, every
once in a while that bandwagon is playing a mighty catchy tune.
So, much as I hate to haul myself onboard and plop down next to
Roger Ebert's sweaty ass, I gotta admit this is thefilm
of the year.
Not that an epic ensemble-cast tale of the 1970s pornographic
film industry is going to be everybody's cup of tea. Not that
everyone will take to this sprawling mix of randy, human comedy
and bleak, soulful drama. Not that there aren't a few folks out
there who, no matter what every film critic in the nation says,
will ever be convinced that a film starring ex-rapper Marky Mark
and ex-"Bandit" Burt Reynolds is Oscar-caliber material.
... But, dammit, it is.
In Boogie Nights, Mark (nee "Marky Mark") Wahlberg
plays Eddie, an ambitious young SoCal teen working as a busboy
in the trendy Hot Traxx discotheque. Unfortunately, our boy just
isn't quite sure what his ambition is. One fateful night,
though, he runs into hot shot porn filmmaker Jack Horner (Burt
Reynolds). It's a match made in Heaven. Seems our boy Eddie is
endowed with a 13-inch crank ("Everyone is blessed with one
special thing," he proclaims proudly). Before you can say
"Holy Macaroni!" Eddie has adopted the name "Dirk
Diggler" and is steadily rising to the top of the adult film
biz. To really grasp Boogie Nights,it must be understood
that porn was more than just big business in the 1970s. With the
worldwide success of films like Behind the Green Door,
porn was on the verge of going mainstream. Times, to say the least,
are kind to Jack Horner and his merry troop of performers (including
Julianne Moore as grand dame porno star Amber Waves, Don Cheadle
as stylistically confused Buck Swope, John C. Reilly as disco
hipster Reed Rothchild and Heather Graham as teeny-bopper sex
queen Rollergirl).
Writer/director Paul Thomas Anderson (an astonishingly young 26
years old) has chosen to focus on a wide range of characters to
show what is, in essence, the rise and fall of a business. Boogie
Nights' narrative runs from 1977 until 1984. The 1970s are
filled with polyester suits, disco parties and uninhibited sex.
Dirk and his fellow porn stars are on a magic carpet ride of fame
and money. Anderson captures the decade of decadence with such
a precise eye for detail that you can almost smell the naugahyde
and Hi Karate. In the 1980s, though, home video came in and assassinated
the "artistic" porno industry. A disastrous New Year's
Eve party ushers in the 1980s on a black note, and the film shifts
gears to show the dark side of fame, power and sex (yes, there's
a dark side to everything). Amazingly, there is no "moralizing"
in this moralistic tale. Drugs, jealousy and big business do take
their toll, but this is far from an indictment of an evil industry.
In fact, Anderson creates a sort of wistful reflection on the
almost "innocent" sex industry of the 1970s.
The real moral here is about family. At 17, our boy Dirk is still
living with his parents--a shrieking harpy of a mother and a do-nothing
father. In joining Jack Horner, Dirk is searching for a place
to fit in. Amazingly enough, he finds it. A family, as Boogie
Nights defines it, is not a biological construct; it is an
entity that loves you unconditionally and forgives your transgressions,
no matter how far from home you stray. Porn auteur Jack Horner
is like the benevolent papa bear to his dysfunctional family of
misfits and good-natured perverts.
I've heard rumblings that Burt Reynolds is "embarrassed"
by this startlingly raw and open-minded film. He shouldn't be.
Boogie Nightsis going to earn him an Oscar. Reynolds,
underplaying masterfully, hands in his best performance since,
um ... well, ever. Fact is, you won't find a performance
in this film that slacks.
To his enormous credit, Anderson directs with a ton of confidence
and not an ounce of bravado. This is only Anderson's second film
(the first being the widely overlooked Hard Eight) and,
quite refreshingly, he feels no need to "show off" here.
Some critics up here on this crowded bandwagon have been calling
Anderson "the next Spielberg" or "the next Tarantino"
or "the next Scorsese." By this time next year, those
same lazy critics will be using the term "the next Paul Thomas
Anderson" for some new kid on the block.